Advocating for Abnormal Behavior, or Not

Advocating for Abnormal Behavior, or Not

The left, the liberal, the Democrat, the progressive use as a mantel their “tolerance” for just about all things. Where they go astray is equating “tolerance” with “endorsement.” Practices many, if not the majority, find objectionable, such as gender-affirming care for minors or public displays of gay or trans identities, especially when children are present, is just not appropriate. What the right considers normal differs from what the left, so it seems, considers normal. The left’s advocacy for trans youth can seem compassionate but turns intolerant when   it demands compliance or shames skeptics. There are schools where teachers teach about gender identity to kids, even providing medical interventions.  This is a form of forced normalization, a normalization only viewed through the lens of the left. Florida and Texas have passed bills, appropriately in my mind, limiting such actions.   This sides with the issue of parental rights and societal norms, yet allows for private choices.  There is a rational resistance to forced normalization, as evidenced by 65% of parents wanting more control over how schools handle gender issues, from a 2024 Pew Research poll. 

Tolerance is not to become open celebrations for such abnormal behaviors or acts.  Let’s not ever make public displays of aberrant or monstrous behavior or acceptance of medical practices on young children that are not able to make a rational decision, normal.   Tolerance is about coexistence, not forced applause. 

Where/Why Did DEI Go Wrong?

 

Where/Why Did DEI Go Wrong?

I've been thinking recently about the impact DEI has had on our nation. When did it all begin. Probably in the 60’s (Civil Rights Movement), then Affirmative Action (1965) gaining prominence in the 2000’s. Obama supported it. And some refer to the DEI boom of 2020, the beginning of the Biden-Harris era.  Certainly it has been perpetuated under administrations headed by Democrat politicians. What is DEI really?  Diversity Equity and Inclusion.  Clearly the words themselves suggest the focus is not on abilities, intellect, or skills, but on the creation of a mixture, to be fair to those that feel maligned and to include whoever and whatever. But when it comes to hiring people for a specific job or purpose how can you ignore the need for a individual that has the ability or the credentials to accept the responsibility for which they will be engaged.   

The focus of DEI was initially qualified minorities, underrepresented groups, yet it seems to have been blacks, and as to “qualified” many concerns have arisen. In an article, The “DEI Myth Debunked,” by Michael Smith, he immediately makes the point, “Black professionals, despite being objectively more qualified for the same jobs, are forced to overachieve just to be considered – while a staggering number of white hires waltz in with mediocrity, nepotism, and a LinkedIn recommendation from Uncle Bob.”  He discusses hiring practices that favor “the white and well-connected.”   He provides little evidence of hiring based on qualifications but charts and graphs based on more white hires that blacks. 

A sidenote regarding minorities. There have always been “underrepresented groups.”  Gays, trans, people of all shapes and colors.  They lived among us all and generally were not a bother.  They found their peer group and areas and were left alone, as in Key West, FL, Providence, RI, in Paris, The Crazy Horse and Folies Bergere.  The DEI trend in many ways used these minorities as an attack mechanism against the majority claiming they were not accepted, and requiring acceptance. The liberals assisted by the media were pushing an agenda made obvious by the dramatic emphasis on DEI.   This then raised concerns and the focus on results. Then signs of reverse discrimination became more evident. 

The initial goal of DEI may not have been to hire unqualified individuals, but to insure qualified non-whites (which is the emphasis of most articles on the subject, whites vs all others) were given proper consideration.  This makes sense, but the outcomes have, in my observation, deviated from the original objective.  There are examples I can reference, such as Kamala Harris for VP, Harvard’s President Claudine Gay, Kantanji Jackson Brown on the SCOTUS, Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, and Biden’s Press Secretary Karine Jean-Pierre, all people of color that lack the best qualifications for their posts.  Then there were a couple of transgender persons in the Biden camp, such as Rachel Levine in Health and Human Services, and Sam Brinton in the Department of Energy (fired after caught stealing a woman’s luggage off an airport baggage carousel and wearing the clothes), among others, for which there were more qualified persons that could have held those positions. 

Over time departments created to administer DEI policies were staffed by DEI candidates, to the exclusion of blacks (4%), but mostly white, may I say liberal, females (gender identity - 78%).  What then happens, well, a combination of cronyism and favoritism towards minorities, as well as a disregard for qualifications necessary to carry out the tasks to be assigned.  Race based hiring then became a trend, as conducted by Air Force General Charles Q. Brown Jr., hiring for the military and promoting for the sake of “diversity.” And the case Diane Runkel vs City of Springfield, Ill (2022) - a long-serving experienced white City employee was denied a managerial position for which fully qualified when the mayor, for touted reasons of diversity, hired a black male, a person who had reported to Runkel, with significantly less experience. In the latter case a white woman was denied, somewhat unusual, as gender diversity was also part of DEI, but most often the gender was other than male or female, more the LGBTQ+ variety.  The irony in all this is that whites became the minority.  And so it happened that whites were not even considered.

A claim that “DEI encourages hate against white people” has been proven false at the executive level, but within the ranks there appears to have evolved elements of black privilege, where blacks believe they have a leg up on most jobs because of color, not ability.  The stigma of ‘racism’ is voiced all too frequently in the media and elsewhere, by blacks on CNN, The View, and other outlets, which I contend is a result of DEI, although not DEI alone.  If a black is criticized, it is ‘racism,’ or denied a promotion, ‘racism,’ or arrested for shop-lifting, ‘racism,’ or challenged for their way of thinking (in politics especially regarding Trump and his administration of policies), ‘racism.’ And if not “racism” then it’s “discrimination.”

Combine the displaced direction of DEI with the deterioration of our national education system, from elementary school through university where concerns for image and sensitivities have for far too long (decades) allowed students to graduate to higher grades while not ready or able to properly read, write or do math at grade level.  The ‘trophy for every participant’ way of thinking has degraded the competitive nature of our society and the goal of achievement, learning and bettering oneself for the good of not just self, but our nation as a whole. It is a known fact that our institutions of education are staffed with a vast majority of liberals; I say this wondering whether an overriding progressive viewpoint has negatively influenced the quality of the results of our system.  Our schools are failing, and it may be due in part to the national teachers union. The union’s protective role where teachers are seldom measured for the results of their students, thus perpetuating standards of mediocracy, and not achievement.  

We must credit the parents that keep the pedal to the floor encouraging their children, from even prior to kindergarten, to learn, to love learning, to compete, to have self-esteem, to be individuals, and know they are loved and play an important role in society; but they must be able to contribute.

There is a case in Tennessee where student William A. (graduated with a 3.4 GPA but was illiterate) was denied the free public education for which he was entitled (under IDEA), and Aleysha Ortiz in Connecticut (Hartford County), graduated with honors, accepted in the University of Connecticut.  Graduating High School, neither could read or write. In each case they were enrolled in IEA (individual education programs)(cutting and pasting from oral reporting) that obviously did not work, the basics, actually reading and writing, ignored by the educators. 

The results of testing of students nationally reflect a troubled public education system, with reading and math comprehension at levels below 60%, and in some cities less than 45%.  A policy analyst, Hannah Schmid, reviewing the Illinois State Board of Education’s report card, writes, “State test scores are in for Chicago public schools and fewer than 1-in-3 students could read and fewer than 1-in-5 do math at their elementary school grade level (2024). Among Chicago's 11th grades, only 22.4% could read at grade level and 18.6% performed math proficiently.…Both reading and math (were) below 2019 levels." The 2019 date is significant because that is the year prior to Covid.  Other major cities, such as Los Angeles, Philadelphia and New York, show proficiency levels significantly less than what they should be.

Reading is a wonderful thing, important for everyone, however there is clear evidence that students are not reading for enjoyment, mostly because they are not able to read at acceptable levels. Children not properly supervised are spending more time on their phones on social media, watching YouTube, and other video outlets, instead of learning independently, exploring ideas and theories. There is a lack of understanding of civics, history (world, American, Presidential, et al), religion and our Constitution. Objectivity and debate are essential, being open to even opposing thoughts and ideas with an independent mind.  

The lack of education is important to the DEI movement, and has impacted any chance it might work, in my view, negatively.  It is those meeting the lowest of standards that suffer the most in terms of equity, and are not generally included due to their lack of skills, abilities, and intellect related directly to their reading and math aptitude. They then become the candidates for DEI positions. They are not prepared to do the jobs for which they may be hired, while checking the box for fulfilling the DEI quota.  All too often someone else needs to do the work required for the DEI hire, or the DEI causes their department or business to be less efficient, even prone to error, and in turn less competitive.  

The outcomes prove DEI’s good intentions have been wronged by our education system, a want by politicians and business leaders to appear progressive, liberal, or accommodating, in some cases required by government edict, and such programs or requisites should to be disbanded.  What America does need is attention to the details of educating our children, our future leaders, and making America the beacon of learning to the world anew.  

Let’s educate all Americans first, insure reading and writing standards are achieved before elevating children to higher levels.  Self-esteem comes with understanding and knowledge. Progressing up the ladder when the next rung is not attainable does not work and in doing so students will become more bitter towards others, feeling inadequate as they cannot compete.  They will then find other outlets for their emotions. And if it’s not knowledge they seek then provide vocational training that suits their aptitude and abilities.  That will enhance belonging and self-esteem too.  Have a talent, a skill, and a means to earn a living.  That is the purpose of education. 

Advocates for DEI suggest it can enhance belonging, reduce biases, and provide economic benefits, but I contend a proper education would reduce DEI reliance and achieve a greater sense of belonging and acceptance. Let’s not make DEI even necessary; I’d prefer having hiring standards more color blind. Interview candidates from behind a screen.  Do not require race or gender be a box checked on a resume.  There is a merit-focused trend under Trump of MEI, Merit, Excellence, Intelligence, which I can understand, however it does not address the critical need for education, rigorous standards, holding underperformers back, and insuring special needs are met with the right kind of attention and oversight. 

 

Requiring DEI in hiring, having departments whose sole role is to monitor DEI applications, is akin to graduating students who are not ready for the next higher grade or the next chapter in their lives.  It is as simple as that. We do a greater disservice to our citizens when we place them where they are not able to be of service.  We need our education system to be the guarantor of our students being able to develop their unique talents, acquire practical skills, and pursue paths that align with their strengths and societal needs. 

by

Thomas W. Balderston

Author and Blogger

Visit Understand-Islam.com too.

The Left’s Cultural Drift, Western Values, and the Challenge of Islam

 

Western civilization, built on principles of individual freedom, family, faith, and nationhood, faces a dual challenge: an internal shift driven by progressive policies and an external tension with Islamic ideology. The Left, in its pursuit of inclusivity and social change, often undermines the stability of Western values while appearing to accommodate an Islamic worldview that resists modernity. This essay argues that the Left’s resentment of traditional norms, coupled with its reluctance to confront Islam’s incompatibilities with democratic ideals, threatens the fabric of civilized societies. By examining these dynamics, we can better understand the stakes for the West’s future.

Western Values vs. Islamic Ideology

Western civilization prizes individual liberty, free expression, and gender equality—values that have evolved over centuries. In contrast, many interpretations of Islam, rooted in 7th-century texts like the Quran and Hadith, emphasize submission to religious authority and strict social hierarchies. While some Muslim-majority countries, like Qatar or Indonesia, have embraced aspects of modernity, others enforce Sharia law, which can restrict education, limit women’s rights, and punish dissent. For example, a 2020 Pew Research study found that 79% of Muslims in 15 surveyed countries supported Sharia as the official law, though interpretations varied widely.

This ideological divide creates tension. Sigmund Freud noted that “civilization began the first time an angry person cast a word instead of a rock.” Yet, in regions where strict Islamic governance prevails, discourse often gives way to violence against perceived infidels or apostates. The 2015 Charlie Hebdo attack in France, perpetrated by Islamist extremists, underscores this challenge. While not all Muslims endorse such acts, the reluctance of some Islamic leaders to condemn them fuels concerns about integration into Western societies.

The Left’s Resentment of Stability

The Left’s approach to modernity often seems at odds with the stability that underpins Western civilization. Liberals champion policies like open borders, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, and environmental, social, and governance (ESG) frameworks, arguing they promote fairness. However, these policies can erode traditional structures. For instance, sanctuary city policies in places like San Francisco have been criticized for shielding criminal non-citizens from deportation. A 2018 Center for Immigration Studies report noted that 22% of federal inmates were non-citizens, despite being 7% of the U.S. population, raising questions about enforcement priorities.

The Left’s cultural stances also spark debate. Support for transgender athletes in women’s sports, as seen in cases like Lia Thomas’s 2022 NCAA swimming victories, has frustrated many who value fair competition. Similarly, protests against Israel’s self-defense following Hamas’s October 2023 attacks—often led by progressive activists on college campuses—suggest a selective empathy that overlooks Hamas’s documented use of human shields (per a 2014 Amnesty International report).

These actions reflect a broader pattern: the Left prioritizes marginalized groups, even when their causes conflict with broader societal norms or security.

Why does the Left seem to resent stability? Some argue it stems from a rejection of traditional hierarchies, viewing them as inherently oppressive. Yet, this resentment can lead to contradictions, like defending Islamic practices that clash with liberal values like gender equality. The Left’s alliance with Islam appears less about shared ideals and more about a shared opposition to Western traditionalism.

Undermining Family and Faith

Western religions like Christianity, Judaism, and Hinduism emphasize family, faith, and community—values that anchor societies. The Left, however, often leans atheistic, prioritizing individual expression over collective tradition. This shift manifests in policies that challenge parental rights, such as school curricula promoting gender identity without parental consent. A 2023 Rasmussen Reports poll found 60% of parents opposed schools teaching gender ideology to young children, highlighting a disconnect.

The Left’s empathy for minorities sometimes overshadows broader societal needs. For example, unrestricted immigration policies can strain public resources. In 2022, the Federation for American Immigration Reform estimated illegal immigration cost U.S. taxpayers $116 billion annually, diverting funds from veterans or the elderly. Meanwhile, the Left’s push for universal voting rights, regardless of citizenship, raises concerns about electoral integrity, as seen in debates over California’s 2015 voting law expansions.

This focus on inclusivity can undermine merit and discipline. Lowering educational standards—such as graduating students who can’t read at grade level—produces ill-equipped adults. A 2021 National Assessment of Educational Progress report showed 23% of 8th graders were functionally illiterate, a trend critics link to lax policies. And recently San Francisco recommended “equity grading” for its 14 High School's students. For some a grade as low as 41/100 will earn a C grade, 21/100 passing, plus no homework or attendance considered in their overall grade. By shielding underachievers from accountability, the Left risks fostering dependency, not empowerment.

Coddling and Its Consequences

The Left’s cultural approach often reflects a “participation trophy” mentality. In 2023, the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported 6.3 million able-bodied adults were out of the workforce, despite job openings. This may stem from a lack of discipline in education and upbringing. For instance, relaxed student loan policies—such as 2022’s proposed forgiveness plans—can incentivize borrowing without accountability, burdening taxpayers with $400 billion in costs, per the Congressional Budget Office.

Vocational training, once a public school staple, has dwindled, leaving many unprepared for practical careers. The Left’s view of government as a universal provider echoes socialist principles, prioritizing safety nets over self-reliance. This coddling can produce adults who expect rewards without effort, undermining the work ethic that drives Western prosperity.

The Left’s Misreading of Islam

The Left often defends Islam as an oppressed minority, dismissing concerns about “Islamophobia” without addressing underlying issues. Yet, global terrorism trends—such as the 2019 Easter Sunday bombings in Sri Lanka, linked to Islamist groups—show that extremism remains a challenge. A 2021 Europol report noted 57% of terrorist attacks in Europe were jihadist-inspired, despite Muslims being a small minority.

Liberals argue that integration and dialogue can reform radical elements, citing successful Muslim communities in places like Canada. However, this optimism overlooks Islam’s political dimensions. Unlike Christianity, which largely separates church and state, some Islamic interpretations demand governance by religious law. The Left’s reluctance to critique this, as seen in their defense of hijab mandates in certain communities, risks enabling ideologies that clash with democratic norms.

Laura Loomer’s May 18, 2025, X post highlighted pro-Hamas, anti-Trump protesters waving a BLM-Palestinian flag hybrid near the Washington Monument, illustrating the Left’s alignment with anti-Western causes. This isn’t universal among liberals—many critique Islamic extremism—but the vocal progressive wing often drowns out such voices.

A Hypocritical Blind Spot

The Left’s inclusivity can mask hypocrisy. When 50 migrants arrived in Martha’s Vineyard in 2022, local leaders—known for supporting open borders—quickly called the National Guard to remove them. This “not in my backyard” attitude reveals a gap between rhetoric and action. Similarly, the Left’s defense of Islam rarely engages with its practices, like honor killings or female genital mutilation, documented in regions like Pakistan (per a 2020 Human Rights Watch report).

This hypocrisy extends to cultural battles. The Left champions DEI but ignores its costs—like reduced hiring standards in critical fields. A 2022 study by the Manhattan Institute found 40% of companies reported lower performance after prioritizing DEI over merit. By shielding Islam and other causes from scrutiny, the Left risks becoming an enabler of anti-Western ideologies.

A Path Forward

Can the West find common ground with Islam or the Left? Some Muslims embrace democratic values, as seen in reformist movements like the Muslim Reform Movement, founded in 2015. However, Islam’s political aspirations—evident in groups like the Muslim Brotherhood—require honest scrutiny, not appeasement. The Left must recognize that defending Islam uncritically aligns them with forces that oppose their own principles.

The Left’s broader cultural project—open borders, eroded merit, and weakened traditions—threatens the West’s resilience. Liberals aren’t inherently anti-Western; many seek justice and equality. But their policies, driven by guilt or idealism, often ignore practical consequences. The 2024 election cycle, with debates over immigration and education, showed 53% of Americans favored stricter border policies (Gallup), signaling a demand for balance.

To preserve Western civilization, the Left must prioritize accountability, merit, and cultural cohesion over ideological purity. They must engage with Islam’s challenges, not as bigots, but as defenders of the freedoms they claim to cherish. Without this awakening, the Left, Democrats, risk a continued erosion of the values that once defined it.  

Reliance will be needed more on the established and accepted values of the conservative, the faith, family, and country focused citizenry. 

By Tom Balderston

Author and Blogger

Visit also: Understand-Islam.com

The Islamic Doomsday Clock

 The Islamic Doomsday Clock 

 

Background

The Muslim world is without parallel in its desire to take the whole world upon itself, form a Caliphate, a one-world order, with an Islamist at its head.  The is not a religious movement.  It uses religion as a ruse, just as Muslims are permitted to lie to non-Muslims to advance the cause of Islam. Islam lies to the world that it is a religion, and even moreso when they say it is “a religion of peace.”

We are all familiar with Communism.  Communism is a political system of governance and control.  It is not a religion.  It prefers a supreme leader, such as Putin, and the Government becomes the caretaker for the people.  What citizens in a Communist controlled country do is dictated by their Government, even as to benefits they may enjoy.  This happens whether or not citizens approve. They are to be thankful to the State for what they are provided.  Providing for themselves is considered selfish and any enterprise that enables profiteering, or capitalism, is viewed with distain and is best when taken over by the government and shared.

Islam is akin to communism.  It seeks a political leader that is a strident adherent to the tenets of this ideology as outlined in their manual, or the Quran.  It has a historical figure as a leader, called a prophet, to provide that religious appeal, and words spoken by him, his lifestyle and habits, are memorized praised and condoned. The history of Islam from its foundation around 600ad has been compiled loosely and mostly from oral recall and traditions.  Many of the ‘memorizers’ died in combat before their recall was ever possible.  The text of the Islam’s manual is not god inspired, but drafted, written and re-written, by leadership that succeeded the original, Muhammad.  It is thus a man made political system with judgements and punishment as dictated by conquerors and marauders.  Even the words of Muhammad were never fully documented for 100 to 200 years after his demise.  Muhammad was murdered, poisoned, by Abu Bakr, the father of the 6 year old Aisha, the child Muhammad married and consummated the marriage upon puberty, when she was 9.  Abu Bakr then became the first leader of the army Muhammad raised and his followers. The Quran did not exist at that time. 

It was from the world of Muhammad, the army he formed to avenge local people that did not consider him a religious leader, that a body of followers after his death were kept together to continue to profit from raiding caravans and unprepared cities and citizens for personal gain.  This practice required a percentage of whatever was stolen to be shared with the leadership.   He came from a home that welcomed many viewpoints, even those that had a god as a focal point.  A moon, an idol, an animal, a symbol, or a substance might have been honored by different sects, different Arab cults.  Muhammad’s family invited this diverse group to gather is peace each year to sell their hand-made crafts. A grand bazaar.  A structure was built to house the many idols which satisfied the gatherers.  But Muhammad objected and protested this practice.  He pointed to only one of the many idols as the only idol to be idolized (or worshipped).  He disrupted the business.  He needed to leave the area to avoid persecution.  In his new location he formed a group of men to raid caravans, of which he was familiar with their routes, going to his hometown to hurt them as he was here by their lack of acceptance.  By the time of his death his army was large.  Any that tried to take the spoils they earned and return to their homes were denied, often killed, and so loyalty was forced upon his troops and their criminal habits continued.  

That was 1400 years ago and the army has grown to over 1.4 billion, maybe more.  Yes, there are more Muslims than there are communists, but it is still not a religion.  It never had a presence in Europe until recently.  The Muslim conquerors were stopped at the border of France and Vienna, never occupying any part of Europe or Scandinavia or England until after WWII. Once inside the walls of this free world, a Christian free world, the Doomsday Clock began ticking.  It was aided also by the wealth of the impoverished Muslim nations created by the discovery of oil. 

Islam, as in communism, is the overseer of the people. They are told by their governing body how to live, daily requirements, some, how to dress, and how they should worship. Not worshipping is not allowed, they must worship the god of their leaders and their leaders as gods. They are also told who to like and who to hate, even how much they are required to give in charity. Independence is not an option. Choice is limited. There is no freedom.  

Reading the Clock

Read the clock starting a 1 o’clock.  “Target an open democratic society.”  Europe was always a target.  The fundamentalists wanted to continue to raid and conquer.  But after WWII they did not have to fight to take territory, they were invited in.  The free world needed labor to continue to grow.  Wealthy nations, more industrial, more educated, are less prone to have large families, as is the need in agrarian nations. Welcoming immigration from poor areas was an attraction to those willing to work.  Muslim nations received invitations and Muslims arrived.  They were happy to work, to earn and to send money home.  At first, as a minority, they simply enjoyed this new world, surprised at the lifestyle and freedom, but kept to themselves, even began to assimilate, especially their children.  The door was open.

At 2 o’clock, the word was out.  There is money and opportunity in the free world.  Migration began in earnest, in much larger numbers, from Turkey, Pakistan, Bangladesh, North Africa, and elsewhere.  Uncivilized persons unfamiliar with how the free world lived brought their beliefs with them, often too their slovenly ways.  

By 3 o’clock Muslim men saw the opportunity with infidel women with whom they were permitted by their scripture to take advantage of, even rape, without consequence.  They were surprised when there was local punishment.  Their excuse, “but this is our belief, our religion, Allah allows it.”  

Between 3 and 4, the attraction of financial stipends and other monies offered by Islamic charities, so to speak, was reason enough to live in communities with other Muslims.  It also became a requirement to attend the area mosque and have children go to the madrassas to receive the benefits.  And by 4 there were communities readily identified as Islamic. Retail and food stores catered to them. Halal foods were available.  It was not uncommon to see residents dressed in the clothing of their prior homeland.  

Then came the requests for special privileges.  5 o’clock. Female doctors for the women.  No female doctors for the men.  The allowance of local rules more in compliance with Sharia. Halal foods available in the public schools. Times for prayer 5 times each day.  As a percentage of the total population their numbers were still low, may 2-3%.  They enjoyed the freedoms, but avoided accepting the culture where they now lived, some did, but the teachers and preachers advised against it, wanting to keep the purity of their ideology in tact.  They began to have more children.  

Wanting to have their enclaves represented in local councils and to have their policies established, seats on local boards and councils were sought.  They had their own bloc of supporters to elect their officials. They targeted seats that would give them the loudest voice.  This is the 6 o’clock stage, You could be assured the Muslims able to vote were not objective in making their choice.  In certain areas even the mayor is a Muslim, or a Congressperson. The population continues to grow as well as the community, occupying a larger area.

More emboldened the Muslims call upon each other at prayer time to gather, even in the streets, to bow to the ground and pray.  Rows upon rows of Muslims on their prayer rugs calling out to Allah.  Traffic is disrupted.  Onlookers walk around them.  A collective mumbling can be heard.  This is 7 o’clock and the Islamists are making their presence known, and want protections to continue to do what they are doing.  Under the ruse of religion, they pray, but pray to their anti-Christ and goal of achieving greater dominance where they are.

Next thy might create their own political party.  Or within existing political parties sub-groups, squads, to enable them to join together having one voice.  They become louder the larger their entity. They seek favorable legislation, always containing elements of Sharia, as well as hate laws, suggesting they are the oppressed and need protection.  Al the while they are growing their army focused on conquest of a new land. Global expansion.  The foreign money continues to flow, more for universities and non-Muslim politicians to garner their acceptance and support, or to just look the other way (while they are counting their money).  It is 8 o’clock somewhere. 

Islamohobia, Islamohobia, becomes the immediate reaction from the Muslims wherever objections to their habits, their practices and their demands are raised.  To maintain the growing fabric of their society within they call upon the elected officials, their own and those they prop up for laws, laws against Islamophobia.  Right.  No one would object to Islam.  Your want to complete, free speech you know, well that cannot be allowed.  It is 9 o’clock and your freedom of speech is under attack.  Christians and Jews cannot speak out for fear of retribution and punishment.  In some cases they cannot pray openly as that might offend a Muslim. Muslims can pray in the streets.  Not so for Christians.  Where did all this sudden sensitivity com from? It is political and suppressive.  The legislative agenda are all oriented to wards the Muslims.  Polticians still call it a religion.   The police are on-board.  There are communities now where the national police cannot enter, as it is a no go for them.  Only the Islamic State police, the monitors of all that is Islam are allowed, and Sharia law is practiced within the gates.  The Muslims want Sharia Law for the entire country.  They are working on getting there.  The oil rich are helping.  More and more mosques are built.  While is Islamic country no new churches, god forbid a synagogue.  In fact churches are being burned.  Christians and Jews marginalized, even killed.  Anti-semitism is on the rise.

And then the grounds of major institutions have Muslims gathered to protest Jews and Christians and their community leaders for not doing more for the Muslims.  They still say they are oppressed.  They are the victims. They point to foreign lands where conflict with Muslims is on the rise and seek support and sympathy for the Islamists.  The Islamists are aggressive yet claim they are not.  When they do attack it is to defend themselves against the hatred lodged against them.  They can lie, in fact do so through fake propaganda.  Their manual tells them to lie (Takiyya and Kitman) to advance the cause of their ideology.  It is good.  And lie they do.  The liberal press eats it up and sides with the Muslim, often publishing their false reports, narratives and photographs.  Leftists appear to be accomplishes.  Even those that would otherwise be subjugated to the wrath of Islam, the gays and the trans, in unity with their so-called oppressed Muslim associates parade and protest against Israel, against the Jew, and for the Islamist, the killers of babies and families.  It is 10 o’clock and terror attacks are prevalent throughout the world.  The Islamists are eradicating the non-Muslims whenever and whenever possible, and when they can get away with it.  And the main stream liberal press ignores it. 

What can happen as the 11th hour approaches? Non-Muslims will be fed up with the penchant to yield to the Muslim. Non-Muslims have rights too. They lack the killer training and brainwashing, but have had enough. They will resist the building of more mosques, the establishment of Muslim only enclaves, the blaring of the Adhan call to prayer, the establishment, use and application of Sharia Law, the Islamist’s treatment of women, as slaves, and the constant violation of human rights prevalent in the Islamic sphere of influence. Cries for their return to their original Muslim nation will be heard. They will begin to understand Islam is not peaceful, nor a religion, but a political scheme to achieve an end that only accepts Islam, its ways, its culture (or lack thereof), and an empire headed by zealots. They will begin result is a civil war. The barbarian Islamists against the civilized world, a return to the 7th century or modernity continued. There will be war. By countries and then globally. 

The Islamist’s expectation at 12 o’clock is victory, an empire greater than the Ottoman’s achievement . One leader, Sharia Law everywhere, thieves without hands, 60 year old men with 10 year old wives, and many more. Churches burned. Bibles destroyed. Israel crushed. Open centers where adulterous women are stoned. Smiling men. Shrouded women. The Adhan blaring 5 times each day. No freedom, just adherence to Islam. The Muslims then will be left to killing only those other Muslims they consider disobedient to the Quran, Muhammad or Allah. The decision makers will remain at odds. The works will become a primitive desert anew. 

A Warning

Beware. The clock is ticking. If Islam can be stopped early in it’s cycle, all the better. If not, then doomsday will arrive one country at a time. The UK and EU are vulnerable. 

By

Tom Balderston

Author and Blogger

Visit also TomBalderston.Blogspot.com