Showing posts with label Opportunity. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Opportunity. Show all posts

Monday, October 12, 2020

Critical Race Theory

Critical Race Theory



This is a fascinating topic which has been applied to efforts to educate persons about race. It has been imposed upon the public sector, agencies in the government, from an historical source which I would venture a guess came from the Obama/Biden administration. Trump was recently provided a review of this practice, a requirement for employees, and deemed that essentially un-American. In the first presidential debate of 2020, when asked about critical race theory from the moderator Chris Wallace, Trump admitted canceling the program for the basic reason that it was teaching persons to hate America. This is something he would not allow.


Mod­er­a­tor Chris Wal­lace asked Pres­i­dent Trump dur­ing the 9/26/202 de­bate why he “di­rected fed­eral agen­cies to end racial-sen­si­tiv­ity train­ing that ad­dresses white priv­i­lege or crit­i­cal race the­ory.” Mr. Trump an­swered: “I ended it be­cause it’s racist.” Par­tic­i­pants “were asked to do things that were ab­solutely in­sane,” he explained. “They were teaching peo­ple to hate our coun­try.”” - WSJ


Critical Race Theory (CRT) is all about race, racism and power.  It arose from the liberal portion of our Nation and has permeated many corners of our society, not just the public sector.  


Christopher F. Rufo/WSJ

One of the advisers to the President on this subject was Christopher F. Rufo, a Wall Street Journal opinion writer. From his piece appearing Monday, October 5, The Truth About Critical Race Theory, a summation.  


“…crit­i­cal race the­ory train­ing sessions in pub­lic agen­cies have pushed a deeply ide­o­log­i­cal agenda that in­cludes re­duc­ing peo­ple to a racial es­sence, seg­re­gating them, and judg­ing them by their group iden­tity rather than in­di­vid­ual char­ac­ter, be­hav­ior and merit.” 


“Examples are instructive. 

  • At… the Treasury Department and federal financial agencies,…employees (were taught) that America was “built on the backs of people who were enslaved” and that all white Americans are complicit in a system of white supremacy “by automatic response to the ways we’re taught.”
  • “Whiteness,” employees are told, “includes white privilege and white supremacy.” Consequently, whites “struggle to own their racism.”
  • “…managers (are instructed) to conduct “listening sessions” in which black employees can speak about their experience and be “seen in their pain,” while white employees are instructed to “sit in the discomfort” and not “fill the silence with your own thoughts and feelings.” Members of “the group you’re allying with (are not) obligated to like you, thank you, feel sorry for you, or forgive you.”
  • “At the Sandia National Laboratories (America’s nuclear technology arsenal) executives held a 3-day racially segregated training session for white male employees, run by White Men as Full Diversity Partners - the goal, examining “white male culture” and making the employees take responsibility for their “white privilege,” “male privilege” and “heterosexual privilege.”
  • “… instructors wrote on a whiteboard that, “white male culture” can be associated with “white supremacists,” “KKK,” “Aryan Nation,” “MAGA hat” and “mass killings.” 
  • On the final day, the trainers asked employees to write letters to women and people of color. One participant apologized for his privilege and another pledged to “be a better ally.”
  • “At… Homeland Security, … a session on “micro-aggressions” argued white Americans have been “fed a racial curriculum based on falsehoods, unwarranted fears, and the belief in their own superiority,” and thus have been “socialized into oppressor roles.” 
  • Trainers taught… employees that the “myth of meritocracy” and “color blindness” is a foundation of racist micro-aggressions and “micro-inequities.” 
  • statements such as “America is the land of opportunity,” “Everybody can succeed in this society, if they work hard enough,” and “I believe the most qualified person should get the job” are racist and harmful—merely code for “People of color are lazy and/or incompetent and need to work harder.” 
  • If a white employee disagrees (with CRT teaching), his/her point of view is dismissed as a “denial of individual racism”—another type of microaggression.


Rufo notes, “To any fair-minded observer, these are not ‘racial sensitivity trainings,’ as Mr. Wallace described them at the Presidential debate. They are political indoctrination sessions. While this misrepresentation is a disappointment, it isn’t a surprise. Progressive activists and their media enablers routinely manipulate words to conceal the truth: Violent riots have become ‘mostly peaceful protests’ and ‘defund the police’ has become ‘reimagine public safety.’”

Millions have been paid to trainers.


The Government has spent millions on trainers nationwide.  The facts are being misrepresented.  Trump was right in stopping this program.  Biden disagreed and, catering to the left, to include the LGBTQ ID group, would have kept the practice in place. 


Wikipedia

From Wikipedia: “Critical race theory (CRT) is a theoretical framework in the social sciences  that examines society and culture as they relate to categorizations of race, law and power. (The emphasis is on categories of people of color).  It is loosely unified by two common themes. Firstly, CRT proposes that (1) white supremacy and racial power are maintained over time, and in particular, that the law may play a role in this process. Secondly, (2) CRT work has investigated the possibility of transforming the relationship between law and racial power, as well as pursuing a project of achieving racial emancipation and anti-subordination more broadly. Developed out of postmodern philosophy, it is based on critical theory, a social philosophy that argues that social problems are influenced and created more by societal structures (i.e. ‘systematic’) and cultural assumptions than by individual and psychological factors. It began as a theoretical movement within American law schools in the mid- to late 1980s as a reworking of critical legal studies on race issues.


By 2002, over 20 American law schools, and at least 3 law schools in other countries, offered critical race theory courses or classes which covered the issue centrally. In addition to law, critical race theory is taught and innovated in the fields of education, political science, women’s studies, ethnic studies, communication, sociology and American studies.”


By the time of the Obama era (2008-2016) it was bright into the public sector, from the university to the corridors of governments, and taught to employees.  Thus taken from liberal college and universities to government offices, to insure all those who govern are indoctrinated in CRT, the objective is to insure minorities are viewed as deserving and whites are guilty of oppression and suppression of opportunities for them whose status is below theirs. Progress in America towards minorities, and opportunity for all citizens is considered a myth.   


Certainly within the corridors of what has become an unbalanced liberal leaning education system in our Nation, this subject has become rather commonplace.  It emphasizes that minorities are being disenfranchised by a system controlled by white males.  Our nations’s progress since Abe Lincoln and emancipation is ignored.  It is essentially reparations, not financially, but in the form of forced guilt upon that segment of society that have achieved through education, self-motivation, personal success (financial and in society) and recognition that equality of hope, choice, freedom, liberty, and fortune does exist for those willing to try. The term ‘systematic’ refers to a system conjured up defined as ‘white privilege,’ comprised of white males, heterosexuals, adherents of Judeo-Christian values, to include Christians and Jews, and other people of faith in God, church attendees, Constitutional originalists, uncle Tom’s (as conservative blacks), non-feminists, pro-lifers, and others viewed or classified as conservatives.  


Carol Swain (a black educator)

Her comments, “Critical race theory is rooted in cultural Marxism; its purpose to divide the world into white oppressors and non-white victims. It uses personal narratives of marginalized minority “victim” groups (black, Hispanic, female, and homosexuals) as irrefutable evidence of the dishonesty of their mostly white heterosexual oppressors. “When it comes to race, there is no way out. Critical race theory assumes that racism is permanent and affects every aspect of our society to include political, economic, social and religious institutions. Being born with white skin is valuable property, and any notion of societal attainment of colorblindness, where race or ethnicity does not hinder opportunities is impossible. Neutrality in law and decision making is a pipe dream that can never be achieved. Therefore, the oppressive system must be dismantled and destroyed.


“This flawed theory of the world suggests that race and ethnicity will always taint and pollute every decision, the result being that racial minorities will consistently lose out to whites because of structural racism.”  


That is the system.  And the result of this thinking is a ‘no way out’ scenario.  The disparities will always exist, the discrimination will remain, and the only solution is though entitlements, wealth transfer, and limitation on free speech that effects the minorities that claim abuse. 


“The message is clear: If you are unfortunate enough to be born with black skin, you are forever a second-class citizen who pays a race penalty. Under this reasoning, the most-affluent blacks rank below the poorest whites when it comes to privilege and opportunities. More than 50 years of affirmative action programs and race consciousness has done nothing to change the trajectory or opportunities of people born without white skin. According to critical theory, every dysfunctional condition in black urban communities can be traced to slavery and its aftermath. There is no place for individual choice initiative.”


(Read More)


The Future - Encourage not Discourage

The problem is that CRT is a downer.  There is no hope expressed, only hatred and division.  I refer to the Obama era as one of Divisivism.  Americans, by electing Obama, thought a black man could curb the tilt towards ongoing racial strife, but instead he put his foot on the accelerator, the gear in reverse, and progress came to a stop. From a ‘beer summit’ to Ferguson he stirred the dark side of America raising from the graves the ghouls of the past, ignoring history all the while.  The Obama’s ignored the fact the slaves were freed with the blood of hundreds of thousands of white men.  Why should they or their ancestors be guilty, or pay reparations?  


President after President saw progress made, not immediate, towards a society that adhered to the Constitution and Declaration of Independence, battles fought, lives lost, all for the freedom of everyone, not just blacks, but hispanics, asians, the Irish, Jewish, the germans, immigrants, men and women. Obama did not continue that discourse, instead used his color, his platform, and revisionist history to alter the conversation and to stir hatred, dividing blacks and whites, those oppressed historically (not currently) from those whose parents led and continue to lead America to increased freedom, and the assurance of freedom and liberty for everyone.  in the late 1800’s the effort was made to start schools for blacks, the HBCUs created after the Civil War, before the Civil Rights Act.  These schools are heavenly subsidized, many, oddly, segregated.  There are over 100 today.  


The black community has a bad habit.  It idolizes losers and ignores those who have succeeded.  Why is that?  This may be political. Other cultures, all other cultures, do the opposite.   The leaders that champion the cause for black minorities need the stories from the past, the oppression and the poverty, the lack of education and the crime, to seek their own fortunes and fame, at the expense of their own people.  The Al Sharpton’s and Farakan’s come to mind.  So too Obama and his wife.  In the news media today we have Juan Williams, Don Lemon, Stacy Abrams (I do not know why), BLM’s Patrisse Cullors, Donna Brazile, many others of color.  There are Democrat black Congresswomen, and men, that continue a daily ‘racist’ platform. This does more to discourage blacks and minorities than encourage.  Trump encourages all Americans and that penchant for hope seems to drive the left crazy.  They want the power, Trump does not, thus he wants all Americans to succeed.  


If the blacks, one after another, are successful, well what happens, we have a more peaceful society, there is an improved focus on family, God and education in their communities, as well as in all communities, as well as in blended communities.  Quotas are not necessary.  The playing field becomes equal.


There is the age old question, however.  Forgetting about race, just consider the balance of power.  Amy Coney Barrett will be confirmed this election year because the President is a Republican, the Constitution calls upon him to name a successor to an empty SCOTUS seat, and the Senate, who confirms, is also majority Republican.  If it was not, she would not be confirmed.  If the tables were turned the Democrats would do the same thing.  So with a society predominantly white, but changing, will attitudes change if society became predominantly black, or hispanic or other? Who would be referred to as the ‘supremests’?  A look to South Africa provides a glimpse. 


Educate Love not Hatred

Our schools need to teach the beauty of America.  This nation is a melting pot of many races, colors, ethnicities, cultures and personal predilections.  Except for the black community, so it seems, all others have embraced the freedom and uniqueness of our Nation.  It is considered great for good reason.  That is what we need to teach.  Teach everyone how to fish, not just how to buy a fish.  Encourage each person to be kind and loving, caring and supportive of each other.  Do not allow negative voices to darken the airways and fill heads with false facts, historical distortions nor twisted views.  The stepping stones to become the greatest nation in the world to live and succeed must continue to be laid, maintained and pave a future for citizens that insures equality, freedom, liberty, trust, love of family, and love of God. What is critical is who we are, not who we were, an who we can and will become, when we all pull together.


God Bless America.


Grace and Peace


by Thomas W. Balderston, author, blogger.  Books available at amazon on Kindle and paperback.  Blogs include Understand-Islam.com and TomBalderston.Blogspot.com.




Wednesday, July 15, 2020

White Black America

White Black America


Independence Day Discussion

Just to broach this subject probably would have the left label me racist.  Mentioning blacks in comparison to whites or other minorities appears to be an automatic trigger. But here goes.  I thought too this Independence Day, July 4, was a good time for such a discussion.  As a minimum discussions about races and racism need to take place, even though it may be impossible to not cross the line somewhat, somewhere, and with someone.  


Listening to presentations from fireworks displays around the Country we are reminded of the breakaway America had from Great Britain.  It was the greatest world power at that time and for over one hundred years after as well.  When you look at the faces of those from whom we sought freedom, life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, the British regimens marching against American volunteer armies, there were not many coloreds. Even in Washington’s brigade black faces were not in evidence.  The war of independence was that of peoples from similar heritage, Europeans, with the differences reflected more in religious practices and ideologies than race.  Freedom was being sought from the oppression of governments, governments that were destructive of the powers given them “from the consent of the governed.” (Quote from the Declaration of Independence).   An objective was “Safety and Happiness” of the people in this new land, which was not the case for many in the UK. Despotism had reduced citizens, willing to be governed, to be oppressed, humiliated, and lacking self-esteem.  This as a result of “a long train of abuses and usurpations.”  This was not to be repeated in America. 


The Tyranny to which people were subject to the King is outlined in the Declaration of Independence. (Copy here).  The King sought increasing power, the abolishment of justice, other than his own, limited voting rights, if any, curbing the growth of a standing army other than his own, taxations without representation, and more, applied at home and also to those in our land (America) far from Britain. Dissidents were transported across the Sea as necessary for a trial without jury.  And there is more.  The resulting war gave America and Americans their freedom.  This we celebrate proudly, indeed we should all be saying, “I am proud to be an American….” expressing the words from a Lee Greenwood song.  What is most interesting is that the slaves that were here were not part of this fight, but they were included. From the Declaration, the words as to being free, “truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.”  American was to be and remain a nation under God, permitted and gifted by the Almighty, the words from the Bible ringing true for everyone, and every race. 

 

Source of America’s Independence

We have acknowledged the source of many white people coming to America. What about the black people?  That immediately brings to the fore the issue of ‘slavery.’ Africa was the source.  Merchants from Portugal brought shiploads of enslaved persons to the American Colonies, and elsewhere as well.  From “Slavery, Power, and the Human Cost, 1455-1755” (a NYT publication associated with the controversial 1619 project),  “Pope Nicholas V buoyed Portuguese efforts and issued the Romanus Pontifex of 1455, which affirmed Portugal’s exclusive rights to territories it claimed along the West African coast and the trade from those areas. It granted the right to invade, plunder and ‘reduce their persons to perpetual slavery.’… Some 12.5 million men, women and children of African descent were forced into the trans-Atlantic slave trade.” (Read More).  Such trade aided in the growth, development of resources and the wealth in the new world, to include areas other than America too. Yet it was not the blacks that fought to establish America as its own Nation.  They were, at the time, oppressed and used as laborers.  In fact they were not aware of any objective for the places to which they were forcibly relocated.  To survive they simply did as they were told, wherever they were.  I must note that there were white indentured servants as well.  Overtime, however, laws enacted did follow racial lines, whereas punishment for the white slaves was less, or limited, to that of the blacks.  The merchants were the white Europeans while those indentured came from other countries, traded, white or black, as chattel.  Bacon’s Rebellion in the 1600’s had black and white indentured peoples fighting the government and the natives.  The result, oddly enough, created laws favoring the white indentured over the blacks, their terms of punishment limited, while the blacks remained enslaved for life.  That was a racial division and reflection of the leaders, the chosen leaders, at that time. 


Paradox

With the Declaration the paradox of freedom and liberty, enslavement still condoned, began to wane, as States, such as Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey began to address the issue and enact changes.  Changes were slow in coming, but heading in the right direction, as progress, towards that which the Founders had envisioned. There were also those who never wanted to change, dividing the new nation, North and South, the South reluctant, due in all probability to the large tobacco and cotton farms that needed the contract labor.  From the day of Independence for the next hundred years progress continued, and the divisions became clearer.  To preserve and ensure a united Union, the President Abraham Lincoln (1861-1865), led the movement to emancipate all.  The North, having done so, became the Union Army that fought for the freedom from slavery that the Rebels, the South, resisted. The Confederate Army was assembled to fight the Union Army.  To be noted, in 1808 international slave trading to America was forbidden, by Congress.  This led rise to a domestic slave trade.  The armies were predominately white, 99%, fighting to free or to keep slaves.  In the end the Union prevailed, more the 600,000 lives were lost. In January of 1863 the Emancipation Proclamation was signed. Thirteenth Amendment was ratified in December 1865.  Slavery was for a period a State matter, and with the amendment it became a National matter, as all men were made free. Just as the Declaration had made clear.  Progress continued.  A predominately while society was giving credence to the blacks living in America.  There were prejudices that were difficult to erase.  Overtime, however, prejudices have diminished, but there remains a few odd elements.  


Blacks were welcomed into the New World, albeit through the slave trade and subsequent victories to free them.  They never sought America as their new home, as did many Europeans, even the Spaniards.  Yet here they were, and free they were, to enjoy what this great opportunity presented.  They were helped by the dominant white population over time to become more part of the whole, a melting pot of races, cultures, and religions.  The goal was and remains, ‘equality.’  To be equal, though, people must strive on their own to take advantage of what is offered and to make themselves, their families, their peers, their neighborhoods, their States and their Nation equal.  People work to improve each other, united in the effort.  Or for some, reluctant to join.  This is unfortunate.   Society has morphed into a mix of achievers and non-achievers.  Yet opportunity remains equal.  Why are so many blacks, as evidenced by the BLM contrivance, so reluctant to fully integrate as citizens.  They are citizens, but more anti-American and more rebels lifting their criminal element higher than those who have attained success and enjoyed the American Dream.  Why are they all too often referred to as ‘Uncle Tom’s’, or essentially denounced by the black poor, underachievers and militants?  Is it a remnant of the past, Europeans versus tribal peoples? Intellectual achievements are to be revered. Why are they not?  A society in the 1700-1800’s that may have been conditioned to regard black people and poor whites (trailer trash) as inferiors has changed, not totally, but progress continues.  Much has been done for the blacks to aide in that progress. 


Congress has acted.  After the civil war the Freedman’s Bureau provided help to millions of black slaves and poor whites. Education was emphasized and provided, colleges and universities established, all to help the oppressed, now free. Today the HBCU’s (Historically Black Colleges and Universities) continue.  Churches also became a beacon of hope and joy, providing assistance and love to promote reform, family and equality. There have been many civil rights laws enacted. Then there was the Great Society and the War on Poverty. Race preferences were given. Housing projects built. School integration was enforced, the National Guard engaged to insure it took place. Segregation was denounced.  Public places could not be restricted. White children were bused to black schools; blacks children were bused to white schools.  Neighborhoods that grew by common association were made open through busing and legislation for open association. The ‘achievement gap,’ poor white and blacks versus what the MSM seems to constantly label the successful or white supremacy class, has been addressed constantly, favoring blacks.  But have the blacks, as a universal culture, made the effort?  Some clearly have, by why such controversy today, even outright denial saying ‘whites’ have not done enough for ‘blacks.’ Reparations are asked for, or more welfare.  Blacks represent 13% of America’s population, but receive 50% of the food stamps. As much as integration was called for in the past, now we hear cries for safe spaces, or segregation.  The hypocrisy is apparent.  This has not been an experiment, but a true desire to have America as a blended society, all equal, regardless of race, religion, creed, et al.  Tolerance was an objective. Peace was an objective.  Progress to continue has always been an objective.  


The Past is the Past

In History the past is the past, it cannot, or should not, be erased. never to be forgotten.  It is how we learn and understand our world, the people in it, their flaws and their perfections. There is no reason for guilt on the part of the early settlers and their families.  Wars were fought and won to achieve a United States, to include a unity of people.  Many hundreds of thousands of white people died to free the black people.  Society as a whole, those who have been successful have striven constantly to open doors and provide opportunity to any who seek, who desire, to make their lives better, provide for their families, who want to achieve for themselves and provide for a greater homeland. Work to do so is required. Not everyone seeks wealth, but everyone, I would pray, wants to live in a safe neighborhood, be able to learn and provide for themselves and their families.  It distresses me the extent to which the family structure has collapsed, and the extent to which our national government seems to pass bills that allow the family unit to be considered less important.  It is the family that makes the whole complete.  The government cannot be a parent.  They can only create chaos as their children have no father figure to guide them, only a collective of ideas driven by the most popular political Party ideology at the time.  God and Family as essential, and that is not government.  Government has its role, its purpose.  It cannot be God.  And it cannot be a mother or father.  The Founders realized this, thus embraced God as the guiding light for America.


Conflict Culture

As America the Beautiful and Great, are we the wrong culture for blacks.  Plenty has been done for them.  Cities having large black populations are in turmoil.  And it is black on black crimes, to include murder, that prevail. Lawless societies that exist in the heart of a great nation.  Using identity politics these black turbulent areas are being used by politicians to help them gain power; they are being used as brainwashed pawns being told they remain as slaves, their living condition a result of continued historical oppressive practices by whites.  Yet we are no longer a slave owning society.  They need to be told they are free and can do and achieve whatever they want.  They need encouragement, not discouragement.  Their lives do matter, as Americans. What do they have to be angry about?  Why the resentment? Who is responsible for their failures today?  Well I can say this.  It is not our Society.  It is not America.  They can only blame themselves and those that prefer they remain oppressed so they can be exploited for political ambitions and purposes.  Remember 13% of our Society is black.  50% of violent crimes in America are committed by this 13%. 


There are many people of different colors and races and nationalities succeeding in America.  We are a Nation of Immigrants. And recently, from an article credited to the Baltimore Sun, the author Ian Duncan, “…since 1965…the Third World, immigrants from Asia and India, people who are not white, not rich, and not connected have quietly succeeded….the children of these people are winning spelling bees and getting top scores on the SAT, (while) black youths are committing half the country’s violent crime….”


With police activities reducing by the cry of BLM, the increase in violence, interestingly, is in black neighborhoods. Are the blacks just prone to tribal violence in spite of 400 years away from their foundations? 


Lives Matter

The BLM movement of late created many disturbances, to say the least, protesting police brutality against blacks.  What they were not protesting, or even concerned about, is black on black crime.  Subsequent to the George Floyd (GF) Minneapolis suspected murder protests across the Nation have caused the police, it seems, to back off.  Black communities have taken control, bearing arms, shooting, even killing, collateral damage, many children. Black children. These children have not received the national notoriety or funerals that GF received, at a time also during Covid when Americans were asked/told not to gather for funerals. But black leaders have been appearing on TV and in media claiming black-on-black crime is not the issue.  Don Lemon of CNN made that clear.  Black on black is as a tribal culture gone wild.  Are they not compatible with Americans?  Black on black crime far exceeds that of police or even white on black crimes.  In spite of all that has been provided to create opportunity the blacks still fail. Why? Do not ask a Democrat as they have been most obvious in that they want it that way. And thus the protest is against the police, when police actions become violent, especially against blacks, and not against the tribe or tribes, who wantonly destroy each other, one tribe seeking to gain an upper hand on the other.  BLM succeeded in having the police back-off, providing less of a presence in the tribal communities, thus giving free-reign to the internal strife, to quests for corner control and the use of illegal weapons against their brethren.  


1619 Project

The New York Times initiated a Project which many are embracing. Armstrong Williams wrote on June 20, 2020 on the townhall.com website, “‘The New York Times' controversial 1619 Project... propagates a popular narrative, which has taken hold among many in the media, politics and education, to link the foundational origins of the American experiment not to the context of the American Revolution of 1776 but to 1619, the year that enslaved Angolans arrived on the shores of colonial Jamestown, Virginia.”


Slavery is not the origin of the referenced ‘American experiment.’ America is not an experiment, but an effort by Europeans, Brits mostly, fleeing their country voluntarily seeking freedom and relief from the practices of a despotic monarchal system. They sought an improved, more open, and objective system of government that legislated for all of its citizens, not select or favored groups or individuals. They arrived after a risky ocean journey with an awareness, knowledge, and a desire to create a new life for a citizenry united in wanting a more democratic governing body and laws, common laws, that were equal and respectful of the rights of all humans. 


These settlers established homesteads under difficult circumstances. It was not unusual for raiding parties to steal, rape, pillage and burn other’s property. It was easier than working. Brutality in the New World was common. People formed their own enclaves and defenses against the marauders. White on white crime was common.  Raids by native tribal Indians was a constant threat. 


The slaves were brought on Portuguese ships as assets to be purchased to do the work of which progress, creativity, invention, and advances in technology now do with equipment, tractors, mowers, reapers, the cotton gin, et al. The enslaved Angolans came as chattel and forced labor. They had no ideals for a new life or government; many were thankful to have survived, and few probably had any idea where they landed and would now be living. 


This was never an experiment by merchants wishing to make citizens of these slaves. It was for profit and to do the work necessary to make large farms and plantations productive. As and when a better way was found then the need for the slaves would be no more.  Or as more Christian, more humane thinkers, came to realize, slavery was no way to treat any human. We are all children of God to be treated equally. 


As the frontier became less barbaric, in fact the process of making it safer, the need for structure and protection was demanded, society grew more unified in needing and requiring fairness, safety, and security.  Local political bodies became important and police or sheriff departments were formed and the universal concept of equal rights was adopted. Governments grew, were layered from local to city to county to state and further, and so too did the voice of freedom grow for all people, to include indentured persons, white and black. They were to be paid, as jobs, not to be enslaved. That was fair. That was humane. It led to the Declaration of Independence and 100 years later to the Emancipation Proclamation . It was an evolving process. Not an experiment seeking an outcome, expected, and to be proven or to fail.  This NYT 1619 project is either political, misguided, or a tantalizing fictional recreation. It is not why America was founded, or the basis for our establishment as a free nation. We are still a work in progress. We have advanced and now are experiencing some setbacks. We must work hard to get this great train back on the right tracks. 


America’s Origins

Certainly the origins of America were not instantaneous, as the 1619 projects suggests 1776 as the start.  As if 1619 was the start? The origins for all practical purposes began prior to the explorer’s arrival.  The concept of liberty and self-government took time to evolve. They took root in Europe, with a revolt occurring due to despotic oppression and a lack of freedoms. Many religious groups aspired to practice their faiths openly and freely.  They needed to find a place where that was possible.  Individuals led the way. Writers and thinkers in Europe introduced studies where human rights, ‘natural rights’, were suggested. The Bible was a significant influence. The protection of life, liberty and property was presented in the early 1200’s in the Magna Carta in England.  It found a new, and improved, voice in America’s Declaration of Independence and Constitution.  But it was being shaped well in advance of arrivals to Jamestown and elsewhere.  Those arriving brought with them documents from their homelands and sought to make the improvements needed.  History was essential to the foundation of this new world, so as not to repeat the sins and errors of the past. 


And we cannot forget Leif Erikson in 1000 coming to America.  Columbus’s 4 voyages never reached the shores of what is the United States, but extensively explored the Caribbean and the Dominican Republic. Amerigo Vespucci (1454-1512) was an Italian (from Florence) sailor, explorer, and trader who followed and his name became associated with the new land, or America.  He declared this land as ‘new,’ and not a border of Asia as Columbus had suggested. John Cabot (explorer Giovanni Caboto) discovered continental North America on June 24, 1497. His son (Sabastian) continued exploring and mapping the coast.


Compatibility

The question - Is American black culture simply incompatible with a great society? Do they possess that much hatred of non-blacks that they are in denial, they refuse to assimilate.  Do they care that little for each other, those of the same race, that their habits reflect only their gang, tribe, or bully-culture-group succeeding, of just for the moment, just at the time, their shooting results in a successful kill shot?  Who dies does not matter. Yet they want whatever they can get, by whatever means possible, from politics to violence. 


I do not have the same problem with black people as they apparently have with me.  Yes, I am white.  Yet my background was not privileged, more from the lower end of the middle-class, never had sports equipment other than used or gifted, and grew up on the streets of a large city.  But I had family, encouragement at home, public schools that taught, church, a willingness to work, and a love for America.  I attended a reasonably priced university, and joined ROTC. I left the big city, first time at 19, and had a desire to live a good life. After my military service I worked, while also attending night school (college), for six years.  I also had my faith, which admittedly became more fully developed, as a convicted believer in Christ, later in life.  America made possible what I am today.  Not rich, but secure, happy, and yet concerned for my safety, surprised and upset about the lack of patriotism, respect for others, and distain for family and God that seems to be seeping into more and more corners of our USA.  Are we still united? I love our flag as it represents what is possible.


The Exploiters

Who are the elites that exploit the blacks? Who allows, encourages, or enables the underachievers, the losers, the homebound basement dwellers to show such animus towards those who have done something with their lives? How much comes from within this community or outside?  We are a rainbow society, from race, to sexual orientation, to common interests, to religion, and more.  But the rainbow arch spans the entire country.  There is the rainbow of losers and underachievers.  There is the rainbow of the successful, the achievers, those that have grown intellectually.  There are among them the bitter, discouraged, poor and underachieving, some addicted, and others that consider themselves culturally incompatible.  They are among the rainbow of losers. There is the rainbow whose colors are many, some distorted, and others whose colors are red, white and blue.  Today it is not about racism.  It is the ends of the rainbow, the one not in the pot of gold, that is fighting and fighting and resisting the reality of their own lack of ambition and success, inducted into the dependency hall of shame created by our government overtime, the liberal side, ironically referred to as progressives, causing their station in life to be a tool.  


How the Main Stream Media became such a champion for the liberal users of the losers is beyond understanding?  But you must consider who taught these non-journalists that appear as opinion-istas on the likes of CNN and MSNBC, as well as historically newsworthy networks such as ABC, NBC, CBS and the like, as well as print media, the leader of the press-pack being the New York Times.  There are those at Fox also that do not escape inherent bias. 


In a WSJ opinion piece by Holman W. Jenkins, Jr. (“The Press on Mount Rushmore: When Donald Trump is gone and forgotten, the media’s lies won’t be so easy to forget”), primarily addressing the Washington Post, and other media outlets, distorting the patriotic and inspiring Trump July 3, 2020 speech at Mt. Rushmore, even lying by introducing elements that were not present, and critical of today’s MSM, he reminded the readers as to a forgotten edict too often dismissed and “a favorite passage from the great Peter Drucker: ‘Every first-rate editor I have ever heard of reads, edits and rewrites every word that goes into his publication. . . . Good editors are not ‘permissive’; they do not let their colleagues do ‘their thing’; they make sure that everybody does the ‘paper’s thing.’ ’ ”  We are, unfortunately, lacking first-rate editors in today’s media.  Yet, there are examples today of the ‘paper’s thing’ from the owners and Editors-in-Charge of a political agenda more than balanced news, in effect perpetrating lies, or a bias, under the guise of reporting just the news of the day. Yes, fake news. 


Freedom - Emancipation

America gave the black and poor whites their freedom.  America has enacted legislation after legislation and spent trillions to bring our society into the same tent. As far back as 1866 legislation to insure the same rights for all was enacted. Note: not one Democrat voted for the bill. That was 100 years before the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  “By 1875, full and equal civil rights for blacks had been passed and signed into law, solely by Republicans….”: Source - The Blaze.  The Ciivil Rights Act of 1957 under Dwight Eisenhower corrected impediments imposed by the Supreme Court and continued to advance the assurance of equality for everyone, even in the voting booth. There was opposition from the Democrats. “Republicans never blocked a major civil rights bill.” Then came 1964, The Civil Rights Act ended segregation in public places and banned employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.  Oddly enough this mirrored much of what had been attempted over the prior 100 years. 


What about welfare reform, who benefitted the most? There are currently six major welfare programs in the United States. These are: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Medicaid, Food Stamps, Social Security, Earned Income Tax Credit, and Housing Assistance. You know the answer. And they want more. 


To give to another, one must take from another, the achievers aiding the losers, hoping one day they will join those who are willing to make themselves and our nation even greater. Too many sit outside the tent burning campfires and asking for handouts, in protest, only wanting more of what others have achieved.   Will there ever be an end to this dilemma.  Can we return to the days before President Lyndon Johnson when progress was positive? Family structure was meaningful.  Church was prominent in family lives.  How can continued progress lack progress at all, such as backward progress, as Islamists seeking 7th century standards when Muhammad lived. We are creating a body of voters the majority of which will soon be the rainbow of losers, unless something changes. When that happens the result will be no more wealth to share.  Can you imagine.  What will there be to complain about?  We will all be poor with no pockets to fleece. 


Change for the better will require government action.  To do that we need a stronger government with better representatives, for sure.  Trump has the right orientation, style aside, while Biden is just a mouthpiece for the leftist money sources, power elitists,  pulling his puppet strings. 


Here is a history of Civil Rights legislation over the years (Read).


We need a grey America that works hand in hand.   None of the government political artists so far have been able to mix the two colors successfully, and I blame that on the black leadership.  


Emancipation meant doors opened. Today there are black leaders that preach ‘doors shut’ slamming them on the hands of those who want to be part of the whole America.  BLM is among them, also Al Sharpton, and MSM black opinion-istas, such as Don Lemon.  But, there are also many black voices that need to heard.  They embrace what America offers, and invite others to be aware, be objective, to stand up for freedom and the protection of others, to grow their families, trust God, take advantage of the many opportunities, encourage each other, and to stop downgrading America.  Included in that role is Thomas Sowell, Candice Owen, Condoleezza Rice, Larry Elder, T. D. Jakes, Tony Dungy, Charles Payne, Leo Terrell, David Webb, and many more.  


It was Jesse Own that said, “Find the good. It’s all around you. Find it, showcase it, and you’ll start believing in it.” 


In Summary

This white-black America has shown what is possible.  But you need to try. Today it is a blend of achievers, scholars, seekers and losers.  There exists a want for a united, peaceful, stable, rainbow Nation.  At the same time there are those hanging on to the past, even exhibiting roots in a tribal culture, and using negative historical elements to induce hatred towards their fellow man for succeeding. The wake-up call needs to be heard by the dependency contingent, blaming others for their plight, that America is their opportunity to leave the ghetto and the past behind and join everyone whose hands are extended to help them and need them.  Encouragement is needed. Entitlements are not the solution. They have been tried and tried. Reparations are not needed or even justified. Leadership, charismatic and incentivizing, that anyone, any color, any race, and creed, can succeed, not by destroying their neighborhoods, or that of others, or parading with placards reminding everyone of the past, but by talking about the significant amount of progress that has occurred and continues.  In peace progress can continue, communities can grow, prosper and provide more jobs.  The leadership needs to let people know what they can do and be, the structure is in place for them, and all they need to do is try.  Tearing down that which has been made, just requires rebuilding, a waste of time, that can otherwise be applied to further growth.  


Remembering the past includes the good and bad, the people, the places, the differences and the battles fought and won or lost.  Erasing history serves no purpose.  Learning about history so that the errors made can be avoided and the foundation upon which a great nation is built can expand and allow for further development is essential.  The embarrassment of a lack of knowledge and understanding by destroying what is important shows a need for improvement in education.  American’s need a proper history lesson in the making of America.  It is not 1619 and it is not 1776.  It is all that came before and the transitions that have been made and are being made to continue to the make the world a better place. America is an example to be followed.  God is in charge, not man.


God Bless America.