Monday, July 27, 2020

God, American Rioters, Liberals and Conservatives

God, American Rioters, Liberals and Conservative

By Thomas W. Balderston, author, blogger.

What to title this discussion is rather difficult.  America is changing, and in my view, not for the better.  Since our foundations America has become the freest, most prosperous Nation in the world.  We have liberties only other nations’ citizens dream about.  Yet the turmoil we are experiencing today in many pockets of our great nation raises many concerns, questions and frustrations.  The abyss between our two political parties, Republican and Democrat, has always existed but today is wider and deeper than ever.  My preference is to see the politics more in terms of values and attitudes towards people and government, or ‘conservative’ and ‘liberal.’


Defined, politically.  Conservative: favoring free enterprise, individual liberties, private ownership, the 2nd Amendment (gun ownership), small government, States Rights, and socially traditional ideas.  Liberal: pro-choice, pro-gay marriage, pro-ObamaCare, pro-minimum wage, pro-labor, pro-strong environmental regulation or pro-preschool supported by taxes, pro-big government, and favoring Federal oversight on matters, even as to States and local authority (such as Education). 


The Declaration of Independence and the Constitution contains language that provides for equality of human rights.  The framers agreed philosophically but not in practice when originally adopted. Overtime, however, modernity brought with it the recognition that the truths set forth are inviolable.  Many lives were lost to achieve the stated ends of these critical documents to America’s ideals.  A Civil War between Southern Democrats seeking retention of their slaves and victorious Union leaders that understood the necessity of a united America created a Unites States, the Union preserved, allowing for continued progress in achieving the ideals of our Founders.  Lest we forget an essential element in the ‘experiment,’ as some have seen America (like the NYT 1619 Project), basic to the freedoms, the liberty and the pursuit of happiness was God, biblical principles than should never be ignored.   If ignored or allowed to be forgotten, the fabric of our Society will be shredded, and humans, whose innate evil nature without the word of God as a reminder, will prevail.  


Islam is an ideology created by humans.  It is not God in action, as clearly Allah is not in any way the same as the Biblical God.  The dictates of Islam’s Scripture (Quran) are the words of humans, mostly men, designed to control their imperialistic desires and those that are compelled to dwell under their dictates. It contains laws designed by Caliphs after the death of Muhammad as mechanisms of control and punishment.  This Scripture is as a book of laws for Muslims only, as the common man, any individual not adhering to the dictates of Islamic Law, are excluded.  Whereas the Bible, as the Word of God, is inspired, the inspired Word, that makes clear that all humans, all lives, matter.  There is truth in the Word of God, and that truth yields freedom for us all. The freedom God provides is from the dictates of man, God’s laws will prevail.  It is the individual that is to be guided by God, by faith, not any ‘system’. Yet God does not say to disregard laws set forth by mortals in their role as leaders, as government, instead calling upon such laws to be fair and equally applied to everyone, regardless of race, creed, status, sex, or political orientation.


In America the liberals want to erase God from the land.  God is too much for the liberal, as a watchman looking over their shoulders as they commit sinful acts.  God is too distressing, too controlling, too restrictive.  And as to all those ‘toos’, God, they are aware, exists, and subdues their desires.  The liberal desire for a big Federal Government is one of controlling the masses to allow them to do as they want.  They can legislate the agenda to shield God from stopping them.  Yet, what they cannot erase is their conscious.  As written in Romans, to the godlessness and wickedness of men “who suppress the truth by their wickedness, since what may be known about God is plain to them….God’s invisible qualities - his eternal power and divine nature - have been clearly seen…so that men are without excuse” (Romans 1:18-21).  The result is these men become ‘fools.’, “they exchanged the truth of God for a lie, and worshipped and served created things (material things) rather than the Creator…” (Romans 1:25).  They become depraved and do what they should not do. They become God-haters and invent ways of doing evil.  They disobey their parents. “They are senseless, faithless, heartless, ruthless” (Romans 1:31).  Even though they know what they do is wrong, they continue; they even approve of those who do the same.  Sound familiar?


To those who see rioting today, while liberals blindly defend the violence as protests, in those who are active there is something missing.  Do they lack confidence in what they themselves can achieve? Have they not received a proper education or been encouraged that America offers everyone opportunities?  The pathway for ALL has been widened and improved, and continues to be enhanced, so that any individual that has the desire, is properly motivated and encouraged, can succeed.  History proves the point.  From errors of the past, even prejudices against different people, not just blacks, but Asians, Hispanics, the Irish, and so on, we learned and fought to have the documents that lay the foundation for America fully understood and adhered to.  We are more the America today our Founders dreamed of, than in 1776. Those objecting may not know who they are, or lack the knowledge or understanding of what has been accomplished on their behalf.  Are the liberals hiding this from them?  My answer is ‘yes!’  


The liberals have infiltrated the corridors of the Federal government putting in place rules and regulations that make difficult firing non-productive workers, even dissidents, or eliminating departments that have no further purpose, or even expanding such departments with employees looking for things to do, to govern, to control, that are not necessary.  President Jimmy Carter took away from the States their oversight of Education.  This is a disgrace, but gave liberals the tools they wanted to change the education system to suit their narrative.  Education is best delivered at the local level, from the home, to the town, to the county to the state. Each State should be its own experiment in how to teach children the most. Competition  for who produces the smartest, the most proficient in history, math, literature, music, and English would improve our Education system. But what has happened in America’s schools, the outcomes are a failure compared to the past, and the overall quality of learning and intellectual achievement has made it harder for individuals to compete.  The majority liberal presence in schools has engendered greater inequality.  Candace Owen made the comment the liberals have effectively allowed ‘psychological conditioning of students to over take learning.”  Hatred for America for many is now more apparent. At the highest level of education, the more elite or top ranked universities are making radicals and subversives of our children.  More attitudes that intelligence.


The Church has been attacked, and attacked. The silent majority has sat by, for the most part, idly, even though many so labelled are considered the Evangelicals.  Our Nation has allowed God to be criticized as too conservative and not liberal enough for the Democrats. From a definition of liberal as willing to respect or accept behavior or opinions different from one's own; open to new ideas, the liberal left has become intransigent.  They are liberal as to gay marriage and homosexuality, but not liberal, or respectful, towards those that do not agree. There is no balance.  Democrats abuse the term ‘liberal’ as they have become most ‘illiberal.’  


The liberals have not set aside their goal of power and control over the people of this Nation, whereupon they can discourage the thought of the American ideal and deny progress, reminding vociferously of a dark past, as if that past still exists.  They hide the opportunities that are real, saying no to those they assemble as victims.  These are not victims of America, they are conceived as victims by Democrats to be used as tools, their names and penmanship only to vote for a Democrat.  Promises are made, lies are told, so often they are considered truth, and when and if elected they are Obama, the great black hope that never delivers.  Yet America has delivered and our citizens must be reminded they just have to drink of the milk of hope, joy and kindness our founders have delivered for them.  It is good, it is healthy, and it will make you better. The Democrats will make sour milk of the sweet cream of our Nation whenever it is convenient.  They have now resorted to lockdowns, riots and rhetoric infused with fake news, distortions, and lies to further their cause.  They do not want schools to open as the continued dumbing down of America serves them well.  


There is too much depression, addiction, hatred, violent habits, fatherless homes, and other dependencies in the Democrat victimhood.  Physical issues, mental issues, family issues abound.  That will continue without God.  There is a spirit inside everyone that needs to be awakened, even resurrected.  It is that spirit that can save this Nation, save many victims, and Make America Great Again.   To know the Lord is to know who you are.


Conservatives are more oriented towards maintaining and fostering the American ideals outlined in our founding documents, to include God, as the ultimate overseer.  The Declaration recognized men “are endowed by their Creator” with natural or human rights.  We are equal as God’s children, and free.  Equality does not mean the ‘same’ as to our starting posts, or abilities, talents, our skin color, our aptitudes, intellect, or even outcomes. But equal as humans, to be respected and accepted.  


The Democrats are attempting to alter our Society, with some success. Obama’s (#42) rhetoric made their vision more obvious.  He defined sin, for him , as when something is “out of alignment with my priorities.”  Thus for him anything goes, if he, himself, says it is OK.  That is not godly.  Thus the concept espoused by the Democrat Party as to what humans can or cannot do.  Sin is left to their devices, not subject to ‘their Creator.’  In achieving power the Democrats see themselves as ‘elites’, those with the necessary aptitude, and even godless philosophy, to rule, as Ben Shapiro, his book How to Destroy America in Three Easy Steps, notes, “for the betterment of the masses” (pg. 28). He goes on to note that under their leadership, “Anything the government can do, it has the justification to do….Government is the only allowable mechanism for dispensing privileges and achieving equality of outcome” (pg. 28).  During Covid it was the Democrats that sought more and more restrictions, lockdowns, on our liberty, our freedom, the inducement was ‘our safety.’  It was not for us to choose our safety but the elite. A taste of Socialism?  It was also a ‘fear’ tactic.  Democrats scare citizens to gain power and reduce freedom.  Covid, the sky is falling, the oceans rising, the climate suffocating, your health, coal carcinogenic, and Trump a despot, impeach him, but the goal is to take away your decision.  Restrict church attendance for social distancing reasons, while allowing casinos to remain open, also liquor and pot shops.  Not your choice, it is the liberal left’s choice for you. 


For the Democrat, the liberal (or illiberal) the individual, their victims, are a means to an end, their end, ungodly as intended, and elitist directed, as god’s substitute. Shapiro reminds his readers that even Lyndon Johnson (#36) spoke of equality as theoretical, as to rights, but also in his view as to outcomes, results.  Equality of outcomes is impossible.  They know it, even under Socialism or Marxism, whatever, it can never be a reality.  If so, all sports played would end in a tie.  All runners would cross the finish line at the same time.  Not possible!  Thus what Democrats propose and what their lemmings seem to believe is everything can be the same, as boring as that might sound.  Redistribute until every financial statement is the same. Uniforms for all, equal square footage of housing, equal pay for whatever work, same hair cuts, no distinguishing characteristics, etc.  If you get my drift, then you know…impossible.  


Trump recognizes the liberal regressive Democrat mindset is counter to America’s framing documents, as well as to God’s commandments.  He has been faced since his election as President (#45) with attacks on his efforts to realign our Federal Government to serve We The People, doing the bidding of those who elected him, not telling the people what they need.  He seeks not a Dependency Hall of Fame for his strident supporters, by a Hall of Fame for those most American, most Patriotic, most knowing of the History of our Nation and those contributing to the continued progress and encouragement of all Americans to achieve their dream. We are not all here for riches and fame, but we are Americans seeking safety and freedom in our homes, on our streets, in our schools, our churches, our cities and our playgrounds. We want to be as free as promised, to choose, to reason, and to declare our views without retribution.  When we are not able to debate, we are not free, and those restricting our speech are the ones seeking to make us less free. 


Who is the Party that has made your views less known or knowable today?  Who is the Party most focused on restricting what you say and do, or limiting your personal preferences, or forcing you to accept dictates from minorities, even viewpoints from the Mainstream Media? Trump is President, not as a politician, but as an American .  He did not seek the office to become a multi-millionaire as have the Clintons, the Bushes, the Obamas and others.  He is the most patriotic, flag loving, person to ever hold the office pf President.  He is not perfect.  None of us are.  But as of today, he is perfect for this job.  


And remember the conservative voice is that of the founders of our nation.  They do not seek to change what our framers created.  And they do not seek to eliminate God as our Creator.  Certainly no man created man.  Only God. America needs God.  Wake Up America. It is the conservative that seeks to preserve our freedom, liberty and pursuit of happiness as persons created by God. That is not what liberals desire. Let God be on your team. 


Thanks Be to the Lord.






















 





 














Wednesday, July 15, 2020

White Black America

White Black America


Independence Day Discussion

Just to broach this subject probably would have the left label me racist.  Mentioning blacks in comparison to whites or other minorities appears to be an automatic trigger. But here goes.  I thought too this Independence Day, July 4, was a good time for such a discussion.  As a minimum discussions about races and racism need to take place, even though it may be impossible to not cross the line somewhat, somewhere, and with someone.  


Listening to presentations from fireworks displays around the Country we are reminded of the breakaway America had from Great Britain.  It was the greatest world power at that time and for over one hundred years after as well.  When you look at the faces of those from whom we sought freedom, life, liberty and pursuit of happiness, the British regimens marching against American volunteer armies, there were not many coloreds. Even in Washington’s brigade black faces were not in evidence.  The war of independence was that of peoples from similar heritage, Europeans, with the differences reflected more in religious practices and ideologies than race.  Freedom was being sought from the oppression of governments, governments that were destructive of the powers given them “from the consent of the governed.” (Quote from the Declaration of Independence).   An objective was “Safety and Happiness” of the people in this new land, which was not the case for many in the UK. Despotism had reduced citizens, willing to be governed, to be oppressed, humiliated, and lacking self-esteem.  This as a result of “a long train of abuses and usurpations.”  This was not to be repeated in America. 


The Tyranny to which people were subject to the King is outlined in the Declaration of Independence. (Copy here).  The King sought increasing power, the abolishment of justice, other than his own, limited voting rights, if any, curbing the growth of a standing army other than his own, taxations without representation, and more, applied at home and also to those in our land (America) far from Britain. Dissidents were transported across the Sea as necessary for a trial without jury.  And there is more.  The resulting war gave America and Americans their freedom.  This we celebrate proudly, indeed we should all be saying, “I am proud to be an American….” expressing the words from a Lee Greenwood song.  What is most interesting is that the slaves that were here were not part of this fight, but they were included. From the Declaration, the words as to being free, “truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights.”  American was to be and remain a nation under God, permitted and gifted by the Almighty, the words from the Bible ringing true for everyone, and every race. 

 

Source of America’s Independence

We have acknowledged the source of many white people coming to America. What about the black people?  That immediately brings to the fore the issue of ‘slavery.’ Africa was the source.  Merchants from Portugal brought shiploads of enslaved persons to the American Colonies, and elsewhere as well.  From “Slavery, Power, and the Human Cost, 1455-1755” (a NYT publication associated with the controversial 1619 project),  “Pope Nicholas V buoyed Portuguese efforts and issued the Romanus Pontifex of 1455, which affirmed Portugal’s exclusive rights to territories it claimed along the West African coast and the trade from those areas. It granted the right to invade, plunder and ‘reduce their persons to perpetual slavery.’… Some 12.5 million men, women and children of African descent were forced into the trans-Atlantic slave trade.” (Read More).  Such trade aided in the growth, development of resources and the wealth in the new world, to include areas other than America too. Yet it was not the blacks that fought to establish America as its own Nation.  They were, at the time, oppressed and used as laborers.  In fact they were not aware of any objective for the places to which they were forcibly relocated.  To survive they simply did as they were told, wherever they were.  I must note that there were white indentured servants as well.  Overtime, however, laws enacted did follow racial lines, whereas punishment for the white slaves was less, or limited, to that of the blacks.  The merchants were the white Europeans while those indentured came from other countries, traded, white or black, as chattel.  Bacon’s Rebellion in the 1600’s had black and white indentured peoples fighting the government and the natives.  The result, oddly enough, created laws favoring the white indentured over the blacks, their terms of punishment limited, while the blacks remained enslaved for life.  That was a racial division and reflection of the leaders, the chosen leaders, at that time. 


Paradox

With the Declaration the paradox of freedom and liberty, enslavement still condoned, began to wane, as States, such as Pennsylvania, New York and New Jersey began to address the issue and enact changes.  Changes were slow in coming, but heading in the right direction, as progress, towards that which the Founders had envisioned. There were also those who never wanted to change, dividing the new nation, North and South, the South reluctant, due in all probability to the large tobacco and cotton farms that needed the contract labor.  From the day of Independence for the next hundred years progress continued, and the divisions became clearer.  To preserve and ensure a united Union, the President Abraham Lincoln (1861-1865), led the movement to emancipate all.  The North, having done so, became the Union Army that fought for the freedom from slavery that the Rebels, the South, resisted. The Confederate Army was assembled to fight the Union Army.  To be noted, in 1808 international slave trading to America was forbidden, by Congress.  This led rise to a domestic slave trade.  The armies were predominately white, 99%, fighting to free or to keep slaves.  In the end the Union prevailed, more the 600,000 lives were lost. In January of 1863 the Emancipation Proclamation was signed. Thirteenth Amendment was ratified in December 1865.  Slavery was for a period a State matter, and with the amendment it became a National matter, as all men were made free. Just as the Declaration had made clear.  Progress continued.  A predominately while society was giving credence to the blacks living in America.  There were prejudices that were difficult to erase.  Overtime, however, prejudices have diminished, but there remains a few odd elements.  


Blacks were welcomed into the New World, albeit through the slave trade and subsequent victories to free them.  They never sought America as their new home, as did many Europeans, even the Spaniards.  Yet here they were, and free they were, to enjoy what this great opportunity presented.  They were helped by the dominant white population over time to become more part of the whole, a melting pot of races, cultures, and religions.  The goal was and remains, ‘equality.’  To be equal, though, people must strive on their own to take advantage of what is offered and to make themselves, their families, their peers, their neighborhoods, their States and their Nation equal.  People work to improve each other, united in the effort.  Or for some, reluctant to join.  This is unfortunate.   Society has morphed into a mix of achievers and non-achievers.  Yet opportunity remains equal.  Why are so many blacks, as evidenced by the BLM contrivance, so reluctant to fully integrate as citizens.  They are citizens, but more anti-American and more rebels lifting their criminal element higher than those who have attained success and enjoyed the American Dream.  Why are they all too often referred to as ‘Uncle Tom’s’, or essentially denounced by the black poor, underachievers and militants?  Is it a remnant of the past, Europeans versus tribal peoples? Intellectual achievements are to be revered. Why are they not?  A society in the 1700-1800’s that may have been conditioned to regard black people and poor whites (trailer trash) as inferiors has changed, not totally, but progress continues.  Much has been done for the blacks to aide in that progress. 


Congress has acted.  After the civil war the Freedman’s Bureau provided help to millions of black slaves and poor whites. Education was emphasized and provided, colleges and universities established, all to help the oppressed, now free. Today the HBCU’s (Historically Black Colleges and Universities) continue.  Churches also became a beacon of hope and joy, providing assistance and love to promote reform, family and equality. There have been many civil rights laws enacted. Then there was the Great Society and the War on Poverty. Race preferences were given. Housing projects built. School integration was enforced, the National Guard engaged to insure it took place. Segregation was denounced.  Public places could not be restricted. White children were bused to black schools; blacks children were bused to white schools.  Neighborhoods that grew by common association were made open through busing and legislation for open association. The ‘achievement gap,’ poor white and blacks versus what the MSM seems to constantly label the successful or white supremacy class, has been addressed constantly, favoring blacks.  But have the blacks, as a universal culture, made the effort?  Some clearly have, by why such controversy today, even outright denial saying ‘whites’ have not done enough for ‘blacks.’ Reparations are asked for, or more welfare.  Blacks represent 13% of America’s population, but receive 50% of the food stamps. As much as integration was called for in the past, now we hear cries for safe spaces, or segregation.  The hypocrisy is apparent.  This has not been an experiment, but a true desire to have America as a blended society, all equal, regardless of race, religion, creed, et al.  Tolerance was an objective. Peace was an objective.  Progress to continue has always been an objective.  


The Past is the Past

In History the past is the past, it cannot, or should not, be erased. never to be forgotten.  It is how we learn and understand our world, the people in it, their flaws and their perfections. There is no reason for guilt on the part of the early settlers and their families.  Wars were fought and won to achieve a United States, to include a unity of people.  Many hundreds of thousands of white people died to free the black people.  Society as a whole, those who have been successful have striven constantly to open doors and provide opportunity to any who seek, who desire, to make their lives better, provide for their families, who want to achieve for themselves and provide for a greater homeland. Work to do so is required. Not everyone seeks wealth, but everyone, I would pray, wants to live in a safe neighborhood, be able to learn and provide for themselves and their families.  It distresses me the extent to which the family structure has collapsed, and the extent to which our national government seems to pass bills that allow the family unit to be considered less important.  It is the family that makes the whole complete.  The government cannot be a parent.  They can only create chaos as their children have no father figure to guide them, only a collective of ideas driven by the most popular political Party ideology at the time.  God and Family as essential, and that is not government.  Government has its role, its purpose.  It cannot be God.  And it cannot be a mother or father.  The Founders realized this, thus embraced God as the guiding light for America.


Conflict Culture

As America the Beautiful and Great, are we the wrong culture for blacks.  Plenty has been done for them.  Cities having large black populations are in turmoil.  And it is black on black crimes, to include murder, that prevail. Lawless societies that exist in the heart of a great nation.  Using identity politics these black turbulent areas are being used by politicians to help them gain power; they are being used as brainwashed pawns being told they remain as slaves, their living condition a result of continued historical oppressive practices by whites.  Yet we are no longer a slave owning society.  They need to be told they are free and can do and achieve whatever they want.  They need encouragement, not discouragement.  Their lives do matter, as Americans. What do they have to be angry about?  Why the resentment? Who is responsible for their failures today?  Well I can say this.  It is not our Society.  It is not America.  They can only blame themselves and those that prefer they remain oppressed so they can be exploited for political ambitions and purposes.  Remember 13% of our Society is black.  50% of violent crimes in America are committed by this 13%. 


There are many people of different colors and races and nationalities succeeding in America.  We are a Nation of Immigrants. And recently, from an article credited to the Baltimore Sun, the author Ian Duncan, “…since 1965…the Third World, immigrants from Asia and India, people who are not white, not rich, and not connected have quietly succeeded….the children of these people are winning spelling bees and getting top scores on the SAT, (while) black youths are committing half the country’s violent crime….”


With police activities reducing by the cry of BLM, the increase in violence, interestingly, is in black neighborhoods. Are the blacks just prone to tribal violence in spite of 400 years away from their foundations? 


Lives Matter

The BLM movement of late created many disturbances, to say the least, protesting police brutality against blacks.  What they were not protesting, or even concerned about, is black on black crime.  Subsequent to the George Floyd (GF) Minneapolis suspected murder protests across the Nation have caused the police, it seems, to back off.  Black communities have taken control, bearing arms, shooting, even killing, collateral damage, many children. Black children. These children have not received the national notoriety or funerals that GF received, at a time also during Covid when Americans were asked/told not to gather for funerals. But black leaders have been appearing on TV and in media claiming black-on-black crime is not the issue.  Don Lemon of CNN made that clear.  Black on black is as a tribal culture gone wild.  Are they not compatible with Americans?  Black on black crime far exceeds that of police or even white on black crimes.  In spite of all that has been provided to create opportunity the blacks still fail. Why? Do not ask a Democrat as they have been most obvious in that they want it that way. And thus the protest is against the police, when police actions become violent, especially against blacks, and not against the tribe or tribes, who wantonly destroy each other, one tribe seeking to gain an upper hand on the other.  BLM succeeded in having the police back-off, providing less of a presence in the tribal communities, thus giving free-reign to the internal strife, to quests for corner control and the use of illegal weapons against their brethren.  


1619 Project

The New York Times initiated a Project which many are embracing. Armstrong Williams wrote on June 20, 2020 on the townhall.com website, “‘The New York Times' controversial 1619 Project... propagates a popular narrative, which has taken hold among many in the media, politics and education, to link the foundational origins of the American experiment not to the context of the American Revolution of 1776 but to 1619, the year that enslaved Angolans arrived on the shores of colonial Jamestown, Virginia.”


Slavery is not the origin of the referenced ‘American experiment.’ America is not an experiment, but an effort by Europeans, Brits mostly, fleeing their country voluntarily seeking freedom and relief from the practices of a despotic monarchal system. They sought an improved, more open, and objective system of government that legislated for all of its citizens, not select or favored groups or individuals. They arrived after a risky ocean journey with an awareness, knowledge, and a desire to create a new life for a citizenry united in wanting a more democratic governing body and laws, common laws, that were equal and respectful of the rights of all humans. 


These settlers established homesteads under difficult circumstances. It was not unusual for raiding parties to steal, rape, pillage and burn other’s property. It was easier than working. Brutality in the New World was common. People formed their own enclaves and defenses against the marauders. White on white crime was common.  Raids by native tribal Indians was a constant threat. 


The slaves were brought on Portuguese ships as assets to be purchased to do the work of which progress, creativity, invention, and advances in technology now do with equipment, tractors, mowers, reapers, the cotton gin, et al. The enslaved Angolans came as chattel and forced labor. They had no ideals for a new life or government; many were thankful to have survived, and few probably had any idea where they landed and would now be living. 


This was never an experiment by merchants wishing to make citizens of these slaves. It was for profit and to do the work necessary to make large farms and plantations productive. As and when a better way was found then the need for the slaves would be no more.  Or as more Christian, more humane thinkers, came to realize, slavery was no way to treat any human. We are all children of God to be treated equally. 


As the frontier became less barbaric, in fact the process of making it safer, the need for structure and protection was demanded, society grew more unified in needing and requiring fairness, safety, and security.  Local political bodies became important and police or sheriff departments were formed and the universal concept of equal rights was adopted. Governments grew, were layered from local to city to county to state and further, and so too did the voice of freedom grow for all people, to include indentured persons, white and black. They were to be paid, as jobs, not to be enslaved. That was fair. That was humane. It led to the Declaration of Independence and 100 years later to the Emancipation Proclamation . It was an evolving process. Not an experiment seeking an outcome, expected, and to be proven or to fail.  This NYT 1619 project is either political, misguided, or a tantalizing fictional recreation. It is not why America was founded, or the basis for our establishment as a free nation. We are still a work in progress. We have advanced and now are experiencing some setbacks. We must work hard to get this great train back on the right tracks. 


America’s Origins

Certainly the origins of America were not instantaneous, as the 1619 projects suggests 1776 as the start.  As if 1619 was the start? The origins for all practical purposes began prior to the explorer’s arrival.  The concept of liberty and self-government took time to evolve. They took root in Europe, with a revolt occurring due to despotic oppression and a lack of freedoms. Many religious groups aspired to practice their faiths openly and freely.  They needed to find a place where that was possible.  Individuals led the way. Writers and thinkers in Europe introduced studies where human rights, ‘natural rights’, were suggested. The Bible was a significant influence. The protection of life, liberty and property was presented in the early 1200’s in the Magna Carta in England.  It found a new, and improved, voice in America’s Declaration of Independence and Constitution.  But it was being shaped well in advance of arrivals to Jamestown and elsewhere.  Those arriving brought with them documents from their homelands and sought to make the improvements needed.  History was essential to the foundation of this new world, so as not to repeat the sins and errors of the past. 


And we cannot forget Leif Erikson in 1000 coming to America.  Columbus’s 4 voyages never reached the shores of what is the United States, but extensively explored the Caribbean and the Dominican Republic. Amerigo Vespucci (1454-1512) was an Italian (from Florence) sailor, explorer, and trader who followed and his name became associated with the new land, or America.  He declared this land as ‘new,’ and not a border of Asia as Columbus had suggested. John Cabot (explorer Giovanni Caboto) discovered continental North America on June 24, 1497. His son (Sabastian) continued exploring and mapping the coast.


Compatibility

The question - Is American black culture simply incompatible with a great society? Do they possess that much hatred of non-blacks that they are in denial, they refuse to assimilate.  Do they care that little for each other, those of the same race, that their habits reflect only their gang, tribe, or bully-culture-group succeeding, of just for the moment, just at the time, their shooting results in a successful kill shot?  Who dies does not matter. Yet they want whatever they can get, by whatever means possible, from politics to violence. 


I do not have the same problem with black people as they apparently have with me.  Yes, I am white.  Yet my background was not privileged, more from the lower end of the middle-class, never had sports equipment other than used or gifted, and grew up on the streets of a large city.  But I had family, encouragement at home, public schools that taught, church, a willingness to work, and a love for America.  I attended a reasonably priced university, and joined ROTC. I left the big city, first time at 19, and had a desire to live a good life. After my military service I worked, while also attending night school (college), for six years.  I also had my faith, which admittedly became more fully developed, as a convicted believer in Christ, later in life.  America made possible what I am today.  Not rich, but secure, happy, and yet concerned for my safety, surprised and upset about the lack of patriotism, respect for others, and distain for family and God that seems to be seeping into more and more corners of our USA.  Are we still united? I love our flag as it represents what is possible.


The Exploiters

Who are the elites that exploit the blacks? Who allows, encourages, or enables the underachievers, the losers, the homebound basement dwellers to show such animus towards those who have done something with their lives? How much comes from within this community or outside?  We are a rainbow society, from race, to sexual orientation, to common interests, to religion, and more.  But the rainbow arch spans the entire country.  There is the rainbow of losers and underachievers.  There is the rainbow of the successful, the achievers, those that have grown intellectually.  There are among them the bitter, discouraged, poor and underachieving, some addicted, and others that consider themselves culturally incompatible.  They are among the rainbow of losers. There is the rainbow whose colors are many, some distorted, and others whose colors are red, white and blue.  Today it is not about racism.  It is the ends of the rainbow, the one not in the pot of gold, that is fighting and fighting and resisting the reality of their own lack of ambition and success, inducted into the dependency hall of shame created by our government overtime, the liberal side, ironically referred to as progressives, causing their station in life to be a tool.  


How the Main Stream Media became such a champion for the liberal users of the losers is beyond understanding?  But you must consider who taught these non-journalists that appear as opinion-istas on the likes of CNN and MSNBC, as well as historically newsworthy networks such as ABC, NBC, CBS and the like, as well as print media, the leader of the press-pack being the New York Times.  There are those at Fox also that do not escape inherent bias. 


In a WSJ opinion piece by Holman W. Jenkins, Jr. (“The Press on Mount Rushmore: When Donald Trump is gone and forgotten, the media’s lies won’t be so easy to forget”), primarily addressing the Washington Post, and other media outlets, distorting the patriotic and inspiring Trump July 3, 2020 speech at Mt. Rushmore, even lying by introducing elements that were not present, and critical of today’s MSM, he reminded the readers as to a forgotten edict too often dismissed and “a favorite passage from the great Peter Drucker: ‘Every first-rate editor I have ever heard of reads, edits and rewrites every word that goes into his publication. . . . Good editors are not ‘permissive’; they do not let their colleagues do ‘their thing’; they make sure that everybody does the ‘paper’s thing.’ ’ ”  We are, unfortunately, lacking first-rate editors in today’s media.  Yet, there are examples today of the ‘paper’s thing’ from the owners and Editors-in-Charge of a political agenda more than balanced news, in effect perpetrating lies, or a bias, under the guise of reporting just the news of the day. Yes, fake news. 


Freedom - Emancipation

America gave the black and poor whites their freedom.  America has enacted legislation after legislation and spent trillions to bring our society into the same tent. As far back as 1866 legislation to insure the same rights for all was enacted. Note: not one Democrat voted for the bill. That was 100 years before the Civil Rights Act of 1964.  “By 1875, full and equal civil rights for blacks had been passed and signed into law, solely by Republicans….”: Source - The Blaze.  The Ciivil Rights Act of 1957 under Dwight Eisenhower corrected impediments imposed by the Supreme Court and continued to advance the assurance of equality for everyone, even in the voting booth. There was opposition from the Democrats. “Republicans never blocked a major civil rights bill.” Then came 1964, The Civil Rights Act ended segregation in public places and banned employment discrimination based on race, color, religion, sex, or national origin.  Oddly enough this mirrored much of what had been attempted over the prior 100 years. 


What about welfare reform, who benefitted the most? There are currently six major welfare programs in the United States. These are: Temporary Assistance for Needy Families, Medicaid, Food Stamps, Social Security, Earned Income Tax Credit, and Housing Assistance. You know the answer. And they want more. 


To give to another, one must take from another, the achievers aiding the losers, hoping one day they will join those who are willing to make themselves and our nation even greater. Too many sit outside the tent burning campfires and asking for handouts, in protest, only wanting more of what others have achieved.   Will there ever be an end to this dilemma.  Can we return to the days before President Lyndon Johnson when progress was positive? Family structure was meaningful.  Church was prominent in family lives.  How can continued progress lack progress at all, such as backward progress, as Islamists seeking 7th century standards when Muhammad lived. We are creating a body of voters the majority of which will soon be the rainbow of losers, unless something changes. When that happens the result will be no more wealth to share.  Can you imagine.  What will there be to complain about?  We will all be poor with no pockets to fleece. 


Change for the better will require government action.  To do that we need a stronger government with better representatives, for sure.  Trump has the right orientation, style aside, while Biden is just a mouthpiece for the leftist money sources, power elitists,  pulling his puppet strings. 


Here is a history of Civil Rights legislation over the years (Read).


We need a grey America that works hand in hand.   None of the government political artists so far have been able to mix the two colors successfully, and I blame that on the black leadership.  


Emancipation meant doors opened. Today there are black leaders that preach ‘doors shut’ slamming them on the hands of those who want to be part of the whole America.  BLM is among them, also Al Sharpton, and MSM black opinion-istas, such as Don Lemon.  But, there are also many black voices that need to heard.  They embrace what America offers, and invite others to be aware, be objective, to stand up for freedom and the protection of others, to grow their families, trust God, take advantage of the many opportunities, encourage each other, and to stop downgrading America.  Included in that role is Thomas Sowell, Candice Owen, Condoleezza Rice, Larry Elder, T. D. Jakes, Tony Dungy, Charles Payne, Leo Terrell, David Webb, and many more.  


It was Jesse Own that said, “Find the good. It’s all around you. Find it, showcase it, and you’ll start believing in it.” 


In Summary

This white-black America has shown what is possible.  But you need to try. Today it is a blend of achievers, scholars, seekers and losers.  There exists a want for a united, peaceful, stable, rainbow Nation.  At the same time there are those hanging on to the past, even exhibiting roots in a tribal culture, and using negative historical elements to induce hatred towards their fellow man for succeeding. The wake-up call needs to be heard by the dependency contingent, blaming others for their plight, that America is their opportunity to leave the ghetto and the past behind and join everyone whose hands are extended to help them and need them.  Encouragement is needed. Entitlements are not the solution. They have been tried and tried. Reparations are not needed or even justified. Leadership, charismatic and incentivizing, that anyone, any color, any race, and creed, can succeed, not by destroying their neighborhoods, or that of others, or parading with placards reminding everyone of the past, but by talking about the significant amount of progress that has occurred and continues.  In peace progress can continue, communities can grow, prosper and provide more jobs.  The leadership needs to let people know what they can do and be, the structure is in place for them, and all they need to do is try.  Tearing down that which has been made, just requires rebuilding, a waste of time, that can otherwise be applied to further growth.  


Remembering the past includes the good and bad, the people, the places, the differences and the battles fought and won or lost.  Erasing history serves no purpose.  Learning about history so that the errors made can be avoided and the foundation upon which a great nation is built can expand and allow for further development is essential.  The embarrassment of a lack of knowledge and understanding by destroying what is important shows a need for improvement in education.  American’s need a proper history lesson in the making of America.  It is not 1619 and it is not 1776.  It is all that came before and the transitions that have been made and are being made to continue to the make the world a better place. America is an example to be followed.  God is in charge, not man.


God Bless America.  








 



















Monday, June 8, 2020

Divisivism - The Real Issue

Divisivism - The Real Issue

by Thomas Balderston.  June 8, 2020

The GF Spark
America experienced a tragic event on Monday May 25 that will become an historical moment, yet the why and the questions continue.  Know it by its’ initial, GF. Racism rose to the top again making it all about ‘racism.’ But is that the truth, is that the real issue? 

The evening of Tuesday June 2, a retired police captain working in a Pawn Shop, met his fate at the hands of looters.  He was taken from his shop, beaten and left to die, all the while a posting on Facebook, showed live his body as blood poured from it until he passed away.  David Dorn was working.  This job was his livelihood.  He was sober. He was killed by thieves for whatever value there was in the items they carried away. 

GF was not working.  Police were called when as store owner reported attempts to pass fake $20’s.  GF was confronted, the details of any conversation with the police officers that arrived the scene are not known.  However he was taken-down, a knee put to his neck and he suffered loss of breath and, most unfortunately and wrong, the loss of his life.  An autopsy called it homicide.  GF was high on crack cocain at the time, and diagnosed with coronavirus.  He did not have symptoms of the virus, but was a carrier.  GF was murdered by what appears to be an overly zealous police officer.  That officer has been charged with murder 2, in Minnesota.  Other officers on the scene have been charged as accomplishes.  

Immediately after the GF incident protesters took to the streets in Minneapolis and soon thereafter, in many cities, in over 40 states, protesting ‘racism.’  The media has closely filmed the demonstrations that were referred to as protests but soon turned to riots involving pillaging, looting, marauding, breaking windows, arson, confrontations with police officers including stabbings and shootings, harming business owners, men and women, and killing David Dorn.

Everyday GF was heralded as the example of systemic racism in America and the protests and looting/rioting was to honor this black man claimed to be murdered by a member of the Minneapolis police force.  The legal elements of the case will proceed.  Whether it will be the outcome the protesters desire, or find as justification for their behavior, is another question. However GF was just a spark, a reason, a justification, an act sufficient, with the right elements to stir those that seek to divide America.  

There have been other GF like sparks.  There was Ferguson, or the Ferguson Uprising. A black man, Michael Brown was shot by police (August 2014).  The Rodney King incident in the spring of 1992. LA police hogtied, beat and kicked Mr. King. It was filmed. The officers were acquitted, even with video tape, by a jury. Riots followed the jury verdict.  King died in 2012 of accidental drowning, with alcohol, marijuana, cocaine and PCP found in his system as contributing factors. There was the Freddie Gray death in Baltimore in 2015, a man died in police cutaway while being transported to be incarcerated.  He was not restrained during transport and suffered a spinal cord injury believed to have resulted from sudden stops made.  Written on Wikidedia, “In a May 4, 2015, interview on Fox News, Alan Dershowitz said that he believes Mosby (Baltimore City State's Attorney, Marilyn Mosby) overcharged the officers in an attempt to satisfy protesters and prevent further disturbances.”  Problems between police and blacks, to include minorities have been ongoing.  They are not universal, but they exist. Ask why?

Self-Preservation
Policing and race relations are a task unto themselves.  Put yourself in their shoes.  White, black or hispanic.  As a police officer not all areas policed are quiet residential neighborhoods.  Where and how people live varies. Police assignments vary.  Over time your mind develops a profile based on experiences.  The experiences involving risk are in the forefront and self-preservation becomes a concern, such concerns most would consider valid.  In the same way when first meeting someone, before any words are spoken, we are all prone to making assessments.  Dress, composure, cleanliness, and eventually how someone speaks enters through our sensory passages, our body and mind more than AI.  If prepared before with verbal or written information on the person being met, our initial perception may be different.  The unknown always makes us leery, just as entering a dark room, or dark alley.  Humans are innately suspicious of personal harm, surprises from circumstances new, unexpected, and foreign.  Conditions and places where persons are first encountered can change attitudes.  This innate element of profiling, all based on what we know, have learned and experienced, is profiling, or a form of racism.  Social and economic factors are in play (socioeconomics). Outward appearances and nature of locations make a difference.  How we protect ourselves is another issue.  But ask should we all simply expect any situation we enter to be perfect, and to react with calm, even when confronted by someone impaired, belligerent, stronger than we are, loud, obnoxious, armed, or providing the impression they are prepared to attack and harm you?  Read and ask yourself that question again. We have our own defense mechanisms.  At times unprepared, when we’d prefer not to be.  If a police officer we are always to be prepared. 

When a police officer finally subdues an assailant, no longer facing a threatening situation, then further force, undue force is not needed.  Vengeance is not needed.  Few of us would readily volunteer or seek as a career path to be a police officer, especially a police officer in a known dangerous area.  That being said, if so employed, once in the dangerous area, getting to know residents, trying to help, you would get to know the good and evil of the environment.  You would know when to be more and better prepared given expectations.  Self-preservation prevails.

Defund the Police
Opinions abound. Some suggestions valid, others crazy.  Something must be done.  Change the model for how police provide security for our citizens.  Defund police. For many it is just about the numbers -  the disproportionate numbers of Indigenous and Black people in our prisons. The back stories are of less importance. Claims are made that bias and diversity training and the use of body-worn cameras have not done enough to change the culture of policing.  The cries ring out, white people are privileged, police are brutal, and inequities exist such that minorities, especially blacks, do not have the same opportunities, even access to the same opportunities.  It becomes a sociology question, and a socioeconomic question.  But there is more.

I was shared a story of a couple that opened an ice cream store in a small city in Florida.  A customer that got to know them one day asked how they came to this location.  The story told was a move from New York City where the husband was a police officer.  He had been shot 4 different occasions.  Enough was enough.  The wife offered to leave with him or without him.  A baby was expected.  He quit the force.  She wanted a husband and father alive to raise their child.  So what does her experiences suggest to her about the Big Apple.  She has her prejudices.  Prejudice and racism go hand in glove.  There will always be racism. 

Divisivism
So what is going on.  My contention is that ‘racism’ as used, when the opportunity caused by a GL like spark occurs, when the crowds that wish to protest police brutality peacefully, a fair cause, morphs into mob rule, anarchy and insurrection, then it is not about ‘racism.  It is about ‘Divisivism.

There are elements in our society that seek to destroy the freedoms we enjoy.  They use, actually abuse, sensitive issues to stir fear, create distrust, and cause division.  It is mostly political, but it has roots.  The roots are in the education of our children, from the earliest grades through college.  It is also the family structure.  There is a growing population of fatherless homes.  When did this begin? My date goes to the Lyndon Johnson era and the establishment of welfare reform, medicare and medicaid.  History tells us after the era of slavery, blacks in America began to find new freedoms.  It was not immediate and not ubiquitous.  But their church, their community, and their families became more important and an expression of their freedom and their willingness to take advantage of opportunities and show their localities, their States and the Nation they were vital contributors and just as human, with the same rights as others, primarily white people with whom they at one time found as their employers and oppressors. Yes, there was resistance.  There was prejudice.  There were superior attitudes.  It would take time for that to change.  Progress has been made.  Great progress.  Not enough progress by the tone of the protests.  Why the dividers? Progress will continue. Most Americans believe we are on the right path and want it to fully succeed. Equal human rights being equal.

Our politically correct culture has sewn a fabric of heightened sensitivity deriving from those who expect the world to be perfect.  In this perfect world everyone is equal, everyone is the same.  There are no poor.  There are no billionaires, or even wealthy people.  Achievers are wrong for their success, as they are in essence showing off to those less able, or less wanting to strive to the extent needed.  Jobs are shared, exchanged.  One day you are the boss, the next you are the janitor, and serve in all levels between.  In a fashion equality and inequality in a society are the same, yet different.  We are equal as to our rights and opportunity.  But we are unequal when it comes to outcomes, as we may not be equal in our hopes, desires, God given talents, and achievements.  We are different as to the sexes and as to our physiques.  Some exercise and some do not, creating inequalities.  So is that unfair?  What is fair about a child being born in a family without a father, or whose father leaves?  How do we equalize that child.  If up to our politically correct society government becomes the substitute for a father or mother, when there is only one as head of household.  But is government effective in that role?

Let me mention one idiom.  God is in charge.  But there are things we can control.  You can study.  You can work.  You can try harder.  This is what makes people different.  And to complain that those that do what they can do are creating inequality is just wrong.  It is a lame reaction to those that lack the desire and will to make an effort.  Followers of God must work at their believing, grow in their faith and become an example to others.  To be a believer does not make you better, it does not make you superior (as Islamism claims).  What it does is make you humble and more accepting of everyone.  If you need a path to less chaos, a more peaceful world, then seek God.  

The Liberal View
Why give up victimhood, it works for the race hustlers. This is a point made by Thomas Sowell, a black intellectual.

The world view of young millennials and others, I am talking liberals, is different from the older, 50’s, and 40’s, liberals. In part that may be due to maturing and successful careers, some with families, and experiences that in the radical leftist liberal Democrat environment become burdensome, troublesome, and less appealing. Passions substitute for the reality of life. Why liberals? The view from the mind of a conservative is different from that of a liberal, regardless of color. The conservatives, black or white, are not taking to the streets. They see the impact on jobs, businesses, and lives as destructive. It destroys opportunity and makes the platform position goals of those pandering to actual racism less attainable. It takes any progress to date and puts it in reverse. It may be temporary, but it impacts gains made. To get ahead you do not stomp on the toes of efforts, achievements, improvements and ongoing successes for minorities. You cannot say the whites are not trying. When you do you confuse, frustrate and stem advances. You create impediments by those making an effort to continuing, concerned, disappointed, saying, ‘what’s the use.’ Nobody cares, they just want more. 

Candice Owen, a black conservative, spoke out during the GF protests and looting saying words much different from those commonly spewed from the main stream media.  She does not give the police officer that killed GF a pass.  But she criticizes the culture of the black community that have repeatedly honored and defended the criminal element, seldom holding up the same of the successful, the accomplished blacks.  All too often the achiever as conservatives are called ‘uncle Toms’ or worse, and that by other blacks.  That is not the case for latinos or whites or other minorities.  She questions that.  But what it comes down to is the liberal lefts Democrats using the blacks, not helping the blacks.  This is Divisivism.


Candice Owen noted that most uprisings, protests for police brutality of blacks, as a common habit, as if whites are not also brutalized by the police, the criminal element the issue, occur during election years.  Why is that?  Simply the left wants power.  And to get power they need the support of the black poor.  Keeping them poor, in blighted neighborhoods, with a weak economy and limited job opportunities helps Democrat politicians appeal for votes from this ID (identity) group.  Why do Democrats and liberal leftists seek illegal immigration, which takes jobs and primarily jobs that blacks can readily fill?  One answer, to keep them jobless and wanting the welfare checks and the largesse from government, offered by Democrats, if indeed they are the majority of the government.  Divisivism is political.   So too is Racism.

Statistics - Facts
Statistics are important.  What the left ignores are the stories behind the statistics.  In the last year deaths of unarmed persons at the hands of policemen were 9 black, 19 white, and what is cited is that the blacks as a percentage of society (13%) are not represented in that stat.  It is higher for blacks.  But the backstory is crimes in American are committed by blacks at a much higher percentage, 44%, than the 13% of society this minority represents.  

Conservative radio show host Larry Elder voiced support for law enforcement after police officers came under fire following the death of George Floyd while he was in custody.

Elder, who is black, noted that statistics show that more unarmed white people were shot and killed in 2019 than unarmed black people.

“How many unarmed blacks were killed by cops last year? 9. How many unarmed whites were killed by cops last year? 19,” he tweeted Tuesday. “More officers are killed every year than are unarmed blacks. When do the #BlueLivesMatter protests begin?”

48 felonious deaths of police officers occurred in 19 states and in Puerto Rico. The number of officers killed as a result of criminal acts in 2019 was 8 less than the 56 officers who were feloniously killed in 2018.  

From the Crime and Law Enforcement Society, “In 2018, there were 686,665 full-time law enforcement officers employed in the United States. The number of full-time law enforcement officers reached a peak in 2008 with 708,569 officers, and hit a low in 2013 with 626,942 officers.” That is about 2/10 of 1% of our Nation.  So to compare, 48 dead of 2/10 of 1% compared to 9 dead of 13% compared to 19 dead of 67%. I’d say the big losers are the police. Of the 48 officers 40 were white, 7 were black, 83.3% compared to 14.5%. 20 died serving traffic tickets or serving warrants or conducting various investigative matters not involving the use of weapons. 

From the WSJ, “The po­lice fa­tally shot nine un­armed blacks and 19 un­armed whites in 2019, ac­cording to a Wash­ing­ton Post data­base.... The Post de­fines “un­armed” broadly to in­clude such cases as a sus­pect in Newark, N.J., who had a loaded hand-gun in his car dur­ing a po­lice chase. In 2018 there were 7,407 black homi­cide vic­tims. Assuming a com­pa­ra­ble number of vic­tims last year, those nine un­armed black vic­tims of po­lice shoot­ings rep­re­sent 0.1% of all African-Amer­i­cans killed in 2019. By contrast, a po­lice of­fi­cer is 18½ times more likely to be killed by a black male than an un­armed black male is to be killed by a po­lice of­fi­cer.”

What is the Fuss?
Why all the hullabaloo? What Officer Chauvin did went too far. It is a tactic used by the MN police force, however this time it went too far. Police interact with civilians, it has been reported, over 375 million times per year. Accidents happen, passions can run hot, and errors in judgment can occur.  Many time events can unfold very rapidly resulting in tragic endings. How often have Americans peacefully protested the death of a police office, or a white bad actor. Why is it mostly blacks receive all the support, criminals no less, for the error of a police officer?  GF was not an innocent man. GF was not a community leader or pillar of the community. He was a black man that was committing a crime, possessing illegal substances, high on drugs, and known by the police due to his extensive police record and history of incarceration. He was not on the mend, reforming in his ways as portrayed by the liberal media. The truth is being hidden, while the murder is being exploited.

This is what the dividers, the divisivists, do. And it occurs most frequently in election years. No crises goes unused. The goal of Divisivism is to reduce any resistance to their objectives, which includes reducing the policing of their actions, reporting all the facts, exposing the truth, and debating their issues. When they can stir any pot of hatred it serves their purpose as they parlay the negative to make it the issue, magnifying any crumb that benefits the goal. They will attack the critic not the criticism. They will blame the one exposing their lies to avoid the lie and it’s connection to them. In Islam it is Takiyya, saying anything if it assists Islam, the truth be dammed. Divisivism has a Manuel, the Rules for Radicals, by Saul Alinsky. It could be the Quran, except the Divisivists embrace the LGBTQ, the Socialist, ANTIFA, and other hate groups.  As with Islam, who care only for the Muslim, the Divisivists only care for those that agree with their ideology. Their expressed hate for God exemplifies the positions they take, which does not avow, ‘live and let live.’  They will destroy their enemy. They boil with hatred. However, different from Islam, they can leave, become a conservative. As an apostate, seeing the truth, they change. Such change elected Donald Trump as President. The apostate of Islam is to be punishable by death. Wouldn’t the Divisivists love that!

The Divisivists have decried, some, not all, the use of military to quell destructive rioting and insurrection. On June 3, Tom Cotton (Arkansas Republican Senator) wrote an opinion piece published by the NYT, titled, “Bring in the Troops”, in which his final paragraph said, “The American people aren’t blind to injustices in our society, but they know that the most basic responsibility of government is to maintain public order and safety. In normal times, local law enforcement can uphold public order. But in rare moments, like ours today, more is needed, even if many politicians prefer to wring their hands while the country burns.” The NYT subsequently apologized to its readers for printing the piece, citing, on June 5, “After publication, this essay met strong criticism from many readers (and many Time’s colleagues), prompting editors to review the piece and the editing process. Based on that review, we have concluded that the essay fell short of our standards and should not have been published.” Everyone has a right to their opinion, but only if it meets media standards, established based on the bias and preferences of the editors and their audience. The NYT tilts left. The editor responsible has left the Times.  

In a Letter in early June to Trump by Cardinal Carlo Maria Viganò*, he wrote, “We will also discover that the riots in these days were provoked by those who, seeing that the virus is inevitably fading and that the social alarm of the pandemic is waning, necessarily have had to provoke civil disturbances, because they would be followed by repression which, although legitimate, could be condemned as an unjustified aggression against the population.…The American people are mature and have now understood how much the mainstream media does not want to spread the truth but seeks to silence and distort it, spreading the lie that is useful for the purposes of their masters.”  There are many seeing the Divisivists at work. 

The Cardinal's letter.

The riots and the many protests, the continued call for more, is a product of the deep state. Many protesters do not realize their passions are being used and mis-directed.  This is an attempt to overturn Trump in November.  After the 3rd of November all of this will quiet down.  If Trump wins there may be some residual uprisings as in the past from the ‘losers’ (call it, ‘upset uprisings').  Biden is being manipulated by those who want to promote the ‘deep state’ and have our Federal Government altered to favor the many forces of evil that appear inherent in their efforts.  He does not embody the goals and objectives of the deep state, but will do anything for the office of President. These Nietzsche übermensch are the ungodly.  Their first attempt to eliminate their competition was and continues, is the attack on God and the church.  Efforts to defund ICE and now the police are just a continuation of their want for a human morality that does not comport with human nature.  Attempts to convince people otherwise is via intimidation, name calling, lies and protests. Would you put your destiny in the hands of these people, the Divisivists? The Cardinal noted, “hidden behind these acts of vandalism and violence there are those who hope to profit from the dissolution of the social order so as to build a world without freedom.” And without hope and joy. 

The Divisivists, the deep state operatives, or as many refer to as the ‘children of darkness,’ have revealed themselves.  This uprising from a tragic consequence is reactive protocol of Divisivism.  Oddly they have as their champion for President, Joe Biden, now living in darkness, figuratively and actually. And as one would expect him to say, “Come’on man, help me outta here.”  But when he emerges from the darkness of his basement, his support for GF will be announced, but unfortunately GF will not be available to be his VP.

There is so much to consider in all this chaos.  Keep your mind open.  Be objective.  

Author:  T W. Balderston, author, blogger, and believer. 


* Titular Archbishop of Ulpiana
Former Apostolic Nuncio to the United States of America